2017
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinations of genotoxic tests for the evaluation of group 1 IARC carcinogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 226 publications
0
8
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-individual variation in DNA damage has been reported to be affected by age and reproductive status, although comparative data across organisms on the relationship between DNA damage, DNA repair, age and sex differences are lacking (Jha 2008). While published studies have demonstrated increased effects in human and mosquito fish ( Gambusia affinis ) females vs males in the micronucleus test (Caliani et al 2009; Fenech and Bonassi 2011), we did not find similar evidence in the literature for the comet assay; this is possibly because the micronucleus test detects a wider array of genotoxic effects (Bhagat 2018). In T. carolina , distinct levels of DNA damage between males and females were observed, with the females showing more damage, probably as a result of lower capacity of DNA repair than males.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Intra-individual variation in DNA damage has been reported to be affected by age and reproductive status, although comparative data across organisms on the relationship between DNA damage, DNA repair, age and sex differences are lacking (Jha 2008). While published studies have demonstrated increased effects in human and mosquito fish ( Gambusia affinis ) females vs males in the micronucleus test (Caliani et al 2009; Fenech and Bonassi 2011), we did not find similar evidence in the literature for the comet assay; this is possibly because the micronucleus test detects a wider array of genotoxic effects (Bhagat 2018). In T. carolina , distinct levels of DNA damage between males and females were observed, with the females showing more damage, probably as a result of lower capacity of DNA repair than males.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, we have demonstrated that a CometChip Platform pre-screen (single dose, acute treatment) may be used to identify DNA damaging agents, but not all genotoxicants will be detected using this method, based on mechanism of action. As recently described 63 , a thorough analysis of genotoxicants requires evaluation by a combination of tests (Comet/CometChip, Ames test, micronucleus, chromosomal aberration), each providing different mechanistic evaluations and revealing genotoxicity profiles based on different modes of action. We suggest that compounds that are negative in a CometChip Platform pre-screen should be subjected to more extensive testing that includes multiple doses and treatment times, in concert with additional assays (Ames test, micronucleus, chromosomal aberration).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, no data from long-term carcinogenicity experiments with rodents are available at present. It is notable in this context that it was found that the sensitivity of a combination of positive MN assays with rodents and in vitro SCGE assays for the detection of group 1 carcinogens (IARC) was found to be 95.6% (Bhagat 2018). In regard to the MN data obtained in bone marrow cells, it will be relevant to investigate if the drugs induce alterations of the erythropoetic system (see above) and also if inhalative and oral exposure cause adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%