Combinatorial Inscribability Obstructions for Higher Dimensional Polytopes

Abstract

For 3-dimensional convex polytopes, inscribability is a classical property that is relatively well-understood due to its relation with Delaunay subdivisions of the plane and hyperbolic geometry. In particular, inscribability can be tested in polynomial time, and for every f-vector of 3-polytopes, there exists an inscribable polytope with that f-vector. For higher dimensional polytopes, much less is known. Of course, for any inscribable polytope, all of its lower dimensional faces need to be inscribable, but this condition does not appear to be very strong. We observe non-trivial new obstructions to the inscribability of polytopes that arise when imposing that a certain inscribable face be inscribed. Using this obstruction, we show that the duals of the 4-dimensional cyclic polytopes with at least eight vertices-all of whose faces are inscribable-are not inscribable. This result is optimal in the following sense: We prove that the duals of the cyclic 4-polytopes with up to seven vertices are, in fact, inscribable. Moreover, we interpret this obstruction combinatorially as a forbidden subposet of the face lattice of a polytope, show that d-dimensional cyclic polytopes with at least d + 4 vertices are not circumscribable, and that no dual of a neighborly 4-polytope with eight vertices, that is, no polytope with f-vector (20,40,28,8), is inscribable.

Inscribable Fans II: Inscribed zonotopes, simplicial arrangements, and reflection groups

“…The question which combinatorial types of 3-polytopes are inscribable was raised by Steiner [23] and settled by Steinitz [24] and Rivin [21]. In stark contrast, our understanding of the inscribability problem in dimensions four and up is rather exiguous [20,10]. In [18], we replaced combinatorial equivalence with the discrete-geometric condition of normal equivalence.…”