2005
DOI: 10.1007/11602613_109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial Network Abstraction by Trees and Distances

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe draw attention to combinatorial network abstraction problems. These are specified by a class P of pattern graphs and a real-valued similarity measure that is based on certain graph properties. For a fixed pattern P and similarity measure , the optimization task on a given graph G is to find a subgraph G ⊆ G which belongs to P and minimizes (G, G ). In this work, we consider this problem for the natural and somewhat general case of trees and distance-based similarity measures. In particular, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However this also points to the challenge in network based visualization -if the network is dense, as similarity based networks often are, the number of edges makes the extraction of truly relevant information difficult [9] and visualization cluttered [10,2,6]. To solve this problem network abstraction or reduction [11] methods construct a sub-network that contains far less data G, E is the set of weighted edges. Wc, and W d are weights based on possibly two different similarity metrics between images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However this also points to the challenge in network based visualization -if the network is dense, as similarity based networks often are, the number of edges makes the extraction of truly relevant information difficult [9] and visualization cluttered [10,2,6]. To solve this problem network abstraction or reduction [11] methods construct a sub-network that contains far less data G, E is the set of weighted edges. Wc, and W d are weights based on possibly two different similarity metrics between images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%