2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1831-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined analysis of cardiac output and CVP changes remains the best way to titrate fluid administration in shocked patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent analysis by Vallee F shows that increase in thermodilution CO following a fluid bolus can predict fluid responsiveness [26]. The invasive techniques such as PiCCO, Vigileo, and arterial BP transducer are widely used in ICU to assess the patients' volume statue.…”
Section: Specificity (95% Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis by Vallee F shows that increase in thermodilution CO following a fluid bolus can predict fluid responsiveness [26]. The invasive techniques such as PiCCO, Vigileo, and arterial BP transducer are widely used in ICU to assess the patients' volume statue.…”
Section: Specificity (95% Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one limitation of such indices is the need for impractical and/or infeasible invasive devices. Thus, there is an increasing need for less invasive approaches [ 18 ]. These may include bedside ultrasound measurements such as variation in inferior vena cava dimensions and Doppler measurements of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) as a stroke volume surrogate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CVP gives an indication of the interaction between heart and venous return [9]. Hence, the change of CVP and cardiac output (CO) should be combined to titrate fluid administration in septic patients [10,11], minimal changes in CVP with increases in CO could indicate fluid responsiveness. Besides, since the CVP is the backpressure to extrathoracic organs, CVP can be used as a safety variable during the fluid challenge [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%