Summary Formation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) tails at a double-strand break (DSB) is a key step in homologous recombination and DNA damage signaling. The enzyme(s) producing ssDNA at DSBs in eukaryotes remains unknown. We monitored 5’-strand resection at inducible DSB ends and identified proteins required for two stages of resection: initiation and long-range 5’-strand resection. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex (MRX) initiates 5’ degradation, whereas Sgs1 and Dna2 degrade 5’-strands exposing long 3’-strands at 4.4 kb/h rate. Deletion of SGS1 or DNA2 reduces resection and DSB repair by single strand annealing between distant repeats. Resection in the absence of SGS1 or DNA2 depends on Exo1. In exo1Δ sgs1Δ mutants the MRX complex and Sae2 in a stepwise manner generate only few hundred nucleotides of ssDNA at the break resulting in inefficient gene conversion and G2/M damage checkpoint arrest. We provide the first comprehensive model of the early steps of DSB repair in eukaryotes.

If not properly processed and repaired, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can give rise to deleterious chromosome rearrangements, which could ultimately lead to the tumor phenotype 1, 2. DSB ends are resected in a 5′ to 3′ fashion in cells, to yield single-stranded DNA for the recruitment of factors critical for DNA damage checkpoint activation and repair by homologous recombination2. The resection process involves redundant pathways consisting of nucleases, DNA helicases, and associated proteins3. Being guided by recent genetic studies 4-6 , we have reconstituted the first eukaryotic ATP-dependent DNA end resection machinery comprising the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex, the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 (STR) complex, Dna2 protein and the heterotrimeric single-strand DNA binding protein RPA. We show that DNA strand separation during end resection is mediated by the Sgs1 helicase function, in a manner that is enhanced by Top3-Rmi1 and MRX. In congruence with genetic observations 6 , while the Dna2 nuclease activity is critical for resection, the Mre11 nuclease activity is dispensable. By examining the top3 Y356F allele and its encoded protein, we provide evidence that the topoisomerase activity of Top3, although critical for the suppression of crossover recombination 2,7 , is not needed for resection either in cells or in the reconstituted system. Our results also unveil a multi-faceted role of RPA, in the sequestration of ssDNA generated by DNA unwinding, enhancement of 5′ strand incision, and protection of the 3′ strand. Our reconstituted system should serve as a useful model for delineating the mechanistic intricacy of the DNA break resection process in eukaryotes.The 3′ ssDNA strands derived from DSB resection attract RPA, which promotes the recruitment of checkpoint proteins to effect cell cycle arrest 8 . With the aid of a recombination mediator protein, such as yeast Rad52 or human BRCA2, the Rad51 recombinase displaces RPA from the ssDNA to assemble into a right-handed helical polymer capable of initiating DSB repair by homologous recombination 1,2 . Genetic studies in yeast have shown that DSB resection proceeds in two steps. The MRX complex plays a 3 To whom correspondences and request for materials should be addressed: Gregory Ira: gira@bcm.edu, Patrick Sung: patrick.sung@yale.edu. role in initiation, while the Sgs1 helicase, its associated proteins Top3 and Rmi1, and the helicase/nuclease Dna2, whose nuclease activity is needed for Okazaki fragment processing 9,10 , constitute the DNA motor-driven path of long-range resection. Exo1, a 5′-3′ exonuclease, defines a redundant resection means 4-6 . Here we reconstitute the Sgs1/Dna2-dependent DNA resection machinery and present results germane for understanding its mechanistic underpinnings.The requisite factors, namely, Sgs1, Top3-Rmi1 (TR) complex, MRX complex, Dna2, and RPA were purified and analyzed (see Supplementary Fig. 2 and the Supplementary Information). As shown in Figure 1a, the combination of these factors degraded a 1.9-kb ...

Cancer cells frequently depend on chromatin regulatory activities to maintain a malignant phenotype. Here, we show that leukemia cells require the mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex for their survival and aberrant self-renewal potential. While Brg1, an ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF, is known to suppress tumor formation in several cell types, we found that leukemia cells instead rely on Brg1 to support their oncogenic transcriptional program, which includes Myc as one of its key targets. To account for this context-specific function, we identify a cluster of lineage-specific enhancers located 1.7 Mb downstream from Myc that are occupied by SWI/SNF as well as the BET protein Brd4. Brg1 is required at these distal elements to maintain transcription factor occupancy and for long-range chromatin looping interactions with the Myc promoter. Notably, these distal Myc enhancers coincide with a region that is focally amplified in~3% of acute myeloid leukemias. Together, these findings define a leukemia maintenance function for SWI/SNF that is linked to enhancer-mediated gene regulation, providing general insights into how cancer cells exploit transcriptional coactivators to maintain oncogenic gene expression programs.

Robust nanofiber gels: Monolithic hydrogels and aerogels consisting of uniform carbonaceous nanofibers (CNFs) were fabricated on a macroscopic scale (12 L, see picture) by a simple template‐directed, hydrothermal carbonization process. The high surface reactivity of the CNFs and high porosity and robust nature of the gels can be exploited in applications such as selective adsorbents and templates for creating functional composite gels.