2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp200293y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Heterogeneous Dual Cation Sites in Cu,M-FER Zeolites

Abstract: Carbon monoxide is frequently used as a probe molecule for characterization of adsorption sites in zeolites by means of infrared (IR) spectroscopy. IR spectra of carbonyl species in zeolites are usually understood within a concept of CO adsorption on a single cation site. This concept, however, is not sufficient in microporous materials when the concentration of cationic sites increases. Adsorption complexes formed on homogeneous dual cation sites were recently described (J. Phys. Chem. B200611022542) based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DFT method describe exactly Cu + cation locations and stretching frequencies of CO adsorption complexes in Cu(I) zeolite. The present study shows similar results of Cu + cation position to previous studies [18,30,31] from cluster to periodic model. The Cu + cation position located in MCM-22 either on the top of channel wall ring (5 or 6-membered ring) and coordinated with 3 framework oxygen atoms (type I) or on the intersection forming between supercage (12membered ring) and crossing window cage (10membered ring) (type II) or edge of sinusoidal channel and coordinated with only two framework oxygen atoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DFT method describe exactly Cu + cation locations and stretching frequencies of CO adsorption complexes in Cu(I) zeolite. The present study shows similar results of Cu + cation position to previous studies [18,30,31] from cluster to periodic model. The Cu + cation position located in MCM-22 either on the top of channel wall ring (5 or 6-membered ring) and coordinated with 3 framework oxygen atoms (type I) or on the intersection forming between supercage (12membered ring) and crossing window cage (10membered ring) (type II) or edge of sinusoidal channel and coordinated with only two framework oxygen atoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present case, we can rule out this kind of assignment because we do not see the typical IR bands due to mono-and di-nitrosyl adducts formed on Cu 2 O upon NO adsorption (vide infra Fig. 108 In the same work, CO adsorption complexes on dual cation sites were not observed in Cu-H-FER and Cu-Na-FER zeolites, 108 making it hard to associate the 2134 cm −1 band to a dual cation adsorption centre in Cu-SSZ-13; indeed M can be only H or Cu in our case. Moreover, UV-Vis spectra (vide infra Section 2.2) do not see the strong energy gap at 16 300 cm −1 of Cu 2 O.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For the sake of comparison with other computational studies [45][46][47][48][49][50][86][87][88] where the PBE [73,74] functional was adopted, additional calculations were performed employing the PBE1PBE [75] functional. Such a modified version of the PBE functional includes a 25% of HartreeFock exchange and was chosen in order to get results comparable at the same time to those obtained by the pure PBE and by the hybrid B3LYP functionals.…”
Section: Basis Set Effects On Cu ? Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge related to the application of quantum mechanical calculations is to find a compromise between accuracy and computational costs, taking into account that zeolites are complex solids with large unit cells. The most simple and the most complex computational approaches are, respectively, quantum mechanical calculations on small and nonstructure-specific cluster models [36][37][38][39][40][41], or the application of quantum-mechanical methods (mostly based on planewaves DFT) to the full periodicity of the zeolite lattice [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Apart from the above two extreme cases, the most widely employed approaches are nowadays molecular orbital calculations which treat only a portion of the S. Morpurgo (&) Á G. Moretti Á M. Bossa Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Roma ''La Sapienza'', P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy e-mail: simone.morpurgo@uniroma1.it structure (i.e., the active site for a given reaction) taking into account in a variable way the geometrical constraints imposed by the remaining part of the crystal [51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%