2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03798
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Extinction and Absorption UV–Visible Spectroscopy as a Method for Revealing Shape Imperfections of Metallic Nanoparticles

Abstract: Metallic nanoparticle solutions are routinely characterized by measuring their extinction spectrum (with UV-vis spectroscopy). Theoretical predictions such as Mie theory for spheres can then be used to infer important properties, such as particle size and concentration. Here we highlight the benefits of measuring not only the extinction (the sum of absorption and scattering) but also the absorption spectrum (which excludes scattering) for routine characterization of metallic nanoparticles. We use an integratin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental analysis is possible but is much rarer due to its complexity. For example, techniques utilising photoacoustic imaging, 33 darkeld microscopy, 34,35 integrating sphere technology, [36][37][38] and others, 39,40 have been developed to measure absorption and scattering spectra of nanoparticle systems. Despite the signicant and valuable information obtained with these techniques, they have not yet achieved widespread use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental analysis is possible but is much rarer due to its complexity. For example, techniques utilising photoacoustic imaging, 33 darkeld microscopy, 34,35 integrating sphere technology, [36][37][38] and others, 39,40 have been developed to measure absorption and scattering spectra of nanoparticle systems. Despite the signicant and valuable information obtained with these techniques, they have not yet achieved widespread use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SM techniques have been used to measure absorption and scattering cross sections originating this time from the same signal [28,29]. Recently, the use of an integrating sphere implemented upon an optical microscope has been demonstrated to enable absorption and scattering measurements on single NPs [30,31]. The main drawbacks of all these techniques are that they require expensive equipment such as lasers, modulating elements, and lock-in amplifiers, and they are sensitive to optical alignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis procedures are also complex and often based on a precise knowledge of the point spread function of the microscope [32]. These drawbacks make SM techniques impractical for routine characterization of NPs [31]. Very recently, Zilli et al introduced a technique aimed to measure all the optical cross sections of individual NPs at once, which is not based on the use of a focused laser and SM measurements [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerical modelling is an excellent tool to use to determine various properties of different nanomaterials using theoretical calculations, there can be discrepancies between experimental results and those calculated by computational programs. [159][160][161][162] Typically discrepancies between experimental and computation methods can be attributed to the fact that properties such as size distribution, geometric parameters and dielectric functions of the actual materials used may not be identical to values inputted or estimated by the softwares. [159][160][161][162] Another parameter than can differ considerably between computational and experimental systems is the type of light source used.…”
Section: Discrepancies Between Experimental Conditions and Modelled Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[159][160][161][162] Typically discrepancies between experimental and computation methods can be attributed to the fact that properties such as size distribution, geometric parameters and dielectric functions of the actual materials used may not be identical to values inputted or estimated by the softwares. [159][160][161][162] Another parameter than can differ considerably between computational and experimental systems is the type of light source used. 163 In these experiments the light source used to thermoplasmonically excite the AgNCs is a laser of unknown polarization.…”
Section: Discrepancies Between Experimental Conditions and Modelled Cmentioning
confidence: 99%