2021
DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s341557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Identification of Novel Markers for Diagnosis and Prognostic of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract: Background An effective diagnostic and prognostic marker based on the gene expression profile of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has not yet been developed. The aim of the present study was to investigate potential markers for the diagnosis and prediction of cHL prognosis. Methods The gene expression profiles with all available clinical features were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Then, multiple machine learning algorithms were applied to dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ). Consistent with previous findings, we identified VEGFA , SPP1 , TREM1 10 , NOS2 11 , S100A8 , S100A9 12 , LILRB2 13 , and LYZ 14 genes (among others) as being enriched in relapsed or U patients. However, the information derived from analyses using individual genes is limited and diffuse and does not allow conclusions to be drawn about biological significance, so we added extra deconvolution steps to facilitate phenotypic characterization with the ssGSEA and CIBERSORTx tools.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1 ). Consistent with previous findings, we identified VEGFA , SPP1 , TREM1 10 , NOS2 11 , S100A8 , S100A9 12 , LILRB2 13 , and LYZ 14 genes (among others) as being enriched in relapsed or U patients. However, the information derived from analyses using individual genes is limited and diffuse and does not allow conclusions to be drawn about biological significance, so we added extra deconvolution steps to facilitate phenotypic characterization with the ssGSEA and CIBERSORTx tools.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1). Consistent with previous ndings, we identi ed VEGFA, 10 SPP1, 10 TREM1, 10 NOS2, 11 S100A8, S100A9, 12 LILRB2, 13 and LYZ 14 genes (among others) as being enriched in relapsed or U patients. However, the information derived from analyses using individual genes is limited and diffuse and does not allow conclusions to be drawn about biological signi cance, so we added extra deconvolution steps to facilitate phenotypic characterization with the ssGSEA and CIBERSORTx tools.…”
Section: ▪ Patient Characteristics and Immune Ngerprintssupporting
confidence: 90%