2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-006-9034-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Immersed Boundary/Large-Eddy-Simulations of Incompressible Three Dimensional Complex Flows

Abstract: In this paper we show how the Immersed Boundary (IB) method can be used with the Large-Eddy-Simulation (LES) to compute moderately high Reynolds number flows in complex geometric configurations. The resulting combination gives an easy-to-use, inexpensive and accurate technique which can be an important step towards the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to industrially rele- vant problems. This paper aims at describing the main features of the method, some of the important drawbacks and possible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to satisfy boundary conditions). In addition to the no-slip boundary condition for velocity, in practice, a wall stress model based on the equilibrium stress balance assumption or the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory is usually adopted when applying IBM to LES [20][21][22], due to impractical refinement of the whole regular grid in order to resolve the near-wall region, and the lack of an accurate wall model applicable for rough surfaces [23]. However, implementation of such a wall model in the context of IBM is not as straightforward as in TFCT due to the fact that an immersed boundary in IBM is generally not co-located with a grid line, and commonly used approaches such as smearing and linear interpolation [11,21] could introduce non-negligible errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to satisfy boundary conditions). In addition to the no-slip boundary condition for velocity, in practice, a wall stress model based on the equilibrium stress balance assumption or the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory is usually adopted when applying IBM to LES [20][21][22], due to impractical refinement of the whole regular grid in order to resolve the near-wall region, and the lack of an accurate wall model applicable for rough surfaces [23]. However, implementation of such a wall model in the context of IBM is not as straightforward as in TFCT due to the fact that an immersed boundary in IBM is generally not co-located with a grid line, and commonly used approaches such as smearing and linear interpolation [11,21] could introduce non-negligible errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fractional-step method is used with a three-step Runge-Kutta predictor to approximate convective and diffusive terms. 34 The solution of a Poisson pressure-correction equation using a multi-grid method is adopted as a corrector at the final step. Hydro3D has been validated in a series of hydroenvironmental engineering related problems, such as the flow in compound channels 35 and tidal steam turbines.…”
Section: A Numerical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of using the IB consists in solving flows bounded by arbitrarily complex geometries without resorting to body-conformal grids for which the motion is prescribed, and, therefore, the solution technique essentially has the same ease of use and efficiency as that of simple geometries. The method is second-order in space and this technique has already been implemented in many different scenarios and grid layouts, e.g., laminar and turbulent convection, 27-29 turbulent flows and particle collision, [30][31][32][33] biological devices, 34 and bifurcations. 35 The threedimensional simulations were conducted using the immersed boundary method of Ref.…”
Section: Numerical Scheme and The Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%