2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10452-006-9076-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined influence of river discharge and wind on littoral nematode communities of a river mouth area of Lake Constance

Abstract: The littoral nematode community adjacent to a river mouth (River Schussen) on Lake Constance (Germany) was studied from February 1999 to January 2000 in order to determine the influence of stress resulting from fluctuations in river discharge on local nematode assemblages. Additionally, the influence of wind as a second important stress factor was considered. Six sample sites were chosen, reflecting a gradient of river influence within the broader river mouth area. Nematode communities, varying in a mean range… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, mixed results have been obtained in flood-disturbed environments when mobile organisms are considered. For example, the research by [14][15][16] using invertebrates, amphibians and nematodes as test organisms, respectively, supports the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in flood-disturbed sites. Meanwhile, studies conducted by [17,18] on macroinvertebrate communities in streams tend to refute the intermediate disturbance hypothesis with respect to flooding disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, mixed results have been obtained in flood-disturbed environments when mobile organisms are considered. For example, the research by [14][15][16] using invertebrates, amphibians and nematodes as test organisms, respectively, supports the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in flood-disturbed sites. Meanwhile, studies conducted by [17,18] on macroinvertebrate communities in streams tend to refute the intermediate disturbance hypothesis with respect to flooding disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%