2013
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2013.797116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined nonmetallic electronegativity equalisation and point–dipole interaction model for the frequency-dependent polarisability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the c H q * parameter increases by a factor of 200, indicating that the parameter now has a larger weight in the parametrization. There are significant changes in the carbon and hydrogen parameters as compared to our previous calibration, 36 but it seems to be a common problem in fluctuating charge models. 105 For the nitrogen parameters, two features are noted.…”
Section: Calculations and Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the c H q * parameter increases by a factor of 200, indicating that the parameter now has a larger weight in the parametrization. There are significant changes in the carbon and hydrogen parameters as compared to our previous calibration, 36 but it seems to be a common problem in fluctuating charge models. 105 For the nitrogen parameters, two features are noted.…”
Section: Calculations and Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The parameters obtained here and in our previous work 36 for C and H are given in Table 2. There are several notable differences between the carbon and hydrogen parameters 36,37,62,63,88 always been sensitive to details in the model and for an atom pair, e.g., C and H, the parameter values can be shifted between the two atom types without modifying a IJ in eq 11.…”
Section: Calculations and Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Specifically, to account for the large polarizability of MNPs, (induced) charges, dipoles, and/or even multipoles would be introduced at each atom site, leading to several (polarizable) force field models for MNPs. These molecular mechanics (MM) methods include the point-dipole interaction model 38,39 (including its combination with either electronegativity equalization 40 or charge-transfer 41 ), charge-dipole interaction model, 42,43 discrete interaction model (DIM) 44,45 and its coordination-dependent variant (cd-DIM), 46 and atomic dipole approximation model. 47 These MM models can be employed in combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) modeling of probe-MNP complexes, where the probe molecule constitutes the QM region so that its vibrational motions (in infrared and Raman spectroscopy) or electronic transitions (in fluorescence) are treated using ab initio QM theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1(a)), multiple competing reactions may be accelerated in the same mechanochemical scenario, [91][92][93] complicating interpretation and/or computational prediction of mechanochemical phenomena. When the process in question involves, e.g., unfolding of biomolecules that are held together by weak interactions (i.e., hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic forces), brute force molecular simulations of mechanical loading 63,[94][95][96][97] or techniques, such as milestoning, that extend simulation time scales 71 may directly show what happens when a molecule is subjected to a mechanical force.…”
Section: A Which Bond Breaks First?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, because molecular energies cannot be represented as sums of pairwise (or other few-body) terms, the force distributions are not uniquely defined. 55 To avoid this difficulty, several groups have resorted to approximations (such as the harmonic approximation 103,104 or molecular mechanics force fields 92,105 ), but little evidence exists that the force distributions obtained this way (and dependent on the details of the approximation to the molecular energy) can correctly predict the weakest bonds in polyatomic molecules. Alternatively, our group showed that it is possible to define force distributions based on molecular geometries alone, 55 as well as to rigorously link such force distributions to the resulting force induced kinetics.…”
Section: A Which Bond Breaks First?mentioning
confidence: 99%