2006
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2006.883649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Filters for Improving Brain-Computer Interfacing

Abstract: Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems create a novel communication channel from the brain to an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. Therefore they could provide a new communication and control option for paralyzed patients. Modern BCI technology is essentially based on techniques for the classification of single-trial brain signals. Here we present a novel technique that allows the simultaneous optimization of a spatial and a spectral filter enhancing discrimin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
226
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
226
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…3, 5) while obtaining a high degree of classification accuracy (80.6%). Although the original CSP method has been extended and improved in a number of directions (Lemm et al 2005;Tomioka et al 2006;Dornhege et al 2006;Blankertz et al 2008), the present study utilizes the original implementation since we were not interested in specific practical applications, where the highest classifications rates are desirable. Although it is possible that using one of the many extensions of the method could improve our classification accuracy, the values already attained are high considering that no artifacts were removed in the data and no trials were discarded based on artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, 5) while obtaining a high degree of classification accuracy (80.6%). Although the original CSP method has been extended and improved in a number of directions (Lemm et al 2005;Tomioka et al 2006;Dornhege et al 2006;Blankertz et al 2008), the present study utilizes the original implementation since we were not interested in specific practical applications, where the highest classifications rates are desirable. Although it is possible that using one of the many extensions of the method could improve our classification accuracy, the values already attained are high considering that no artifacts were removed in the data and no trials were discarded based on artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data gathered during the training session was sliced in 10-second windows. These samples were whitened [2], and the variance was computed as an indication of the power in the window. A support vector machines (SVM) classifier trained on the training session data provided different weights for each of the EEG channels.…”
Section: Eeg Analysis and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chin et al [6] presented discriminative channel addition (DCA) approach and discriminative channel reduction (DCR) approach to select subject-specific discriminative channels by iteratively adding or removing channels based on the cross-validation classification accuracies. Moreover, several novel approaches, called, common spatio-spectral pattern (CSSP) [4], common sparse spectral spatial pattern (CSSSP) [7], filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) [8] and common spatial-spectral boosting pattern (CSSBP) [9,10] were proposed. These methods simultaneously optimize a spatial filter and a spectral filter to enhance discriminability rates of multichannel EEG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%