2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined radical prostatectomy and abdominoperineal resection for locally invasive rectal cancer

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONAn infiltration of urological organs is found in 5–10% of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Total pelvic exenteration is the standard procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer. In selected patients with rectal cancer involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, the bladder can be preserved and en bloc radical prostatectomy with abdominoperineal rectal resection can be performed. We report two patients who treated with this combined approach.PRESENTATION OF CASETwo patients with symptoms of rect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ERR seems to be a valid option with the partial or complete removal of viscera infiltrated by rectal cancer, sparing uninvolved organs and thus avoiding TPE and the morbidity associated with it. There are various small series of en bloc prostatic wedge resection, total prostatectomy, seminal vesicle excision and urinary bladder wedge resection for locally advanced rectal cancer [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Apart from the current study, Frasson et al [19] compared TPE and ERR recurrence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ERR seems to be a valid option with the partial or complete removal of viscera infiltrated by rectal cancer, sparing uninvolved organs and thus avoiding TPE and the morbidity associated with it. There are various small series of en bloc prostatic wedge resection, total prostatectomy, seminal vesicle excision and urinary bladder wedge resection for locally advanced rectal cancer [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Apart from the current study, Frasson et al [19] compared TPE and ERR recurrence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%