2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined surface activated bonding using H-containing HCOOH vapor treatment for Cu/Adhesive hybrid bonding at below 200 °C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that polyimide and Cu foil failed to achieve bonding at N 2 atmosphere even with a pressure of 30 MPa, while they were robustly bonded at the Ptcatalyzed formic acid atmosphere. It is reported that Pt catalyzes the formic acid to generate H free radicals [20], which reduces Cu oxides to activate surface diffusion and promotes bonding at low temperatures. Additionally, once bonding was achieved, the shear strength of bonded samples increased with increasing pressure, reaching the maximum of 20.31 MPa when the pressure was 30 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that polyimide and Cu foil failed to achieve bonding at N 2 atmosphere even with a pressure of 30 MPa, while they were robustly bonded at the Ptcatalyzed formic acid atmosphere. It is reported that Pt catalyzes the formic acid to generate H free radicals [20], which reduces Cu oxides to activate surface diffusion and promotes bonding at low temperatures. Additionally, once bonding was achieved, the shear strength of bonded samples increased with increasing pressure, reaching the maximum of 20.31 MPa when the pressure was 30 MPa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) analysis, the ratio of the number of Cu atoms to the number of Sn atoms is about 11:3, and then the composition analysis of the cross sections of different bonding bumps is basically close to the atomic ratio of Cu 3 Sn, so the intermediate layer was determined to be Cu 3 Sn [ 23 ]. The Cu 3 Sn and Cu have similar density; when Cu 3 Sn grew on the surface of Cu, the change in volume was very small, so it could generate a dense structure, reasonable metal structure and bonding optimization conditions, there was not too much Cu 6 Sn 5 , avoiding the Kirkendall effect [ 24 , 25 ]. In addition, there were some white bright spots in the IMC layer, but they were not via.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formic acid (FA, HCOOH) is another acid that erases copper oxide with the special capability that HCOOH converts the oxide to Cu-HCOO and Cu-O-H, which may decompose to Cu. He et al (2017a, 2017b) used H-containing HCOOH vapor and combined the SAB method to bond the Cu/adhesive hybrid samples at 180°C–200°C. Furthermore, the “Cu-first” bonding strategy is confirmed instead of the “adhesive-first” method [schematic diagram is illustrated in Figure 4(c)].…”
Section: Wet Treatment and Plasma-assisted Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) TEM image of Cu-Cu bonding without a Si layer (He et al , 2016b); (b) cross-sectional FIB analyses of Cu-Cu bonding treated by citric acid (Hung et al , 2021); (c) schematic diagram of the “adhesive-first” bonding strategy (He et al , 2017a); (d) copper bonding temperature-time map (He et al , 2017a); (e) schematic diagram of the PAB method treatment (Chua et al , 2019)…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%