2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined thermochemical and fermentative destruction of municipal biosolids: A comparison between thermal hydrolysis and wet oxidative pre-treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the production of these acids has received increasing attention. Strong et al examined destruction of municipal sludge and production of organic acids using wet oxidation treatment followed by anaerobic fermentation [4]. These studies demonstrated combined techniques and new approaches for the handling of municipal sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the production of these acids has received increasing attention. Strong et al examined destruction of municipal sludge and production of organic acids using wet oxidation treatment followed by anaerobic fermentation [4]. These studies demonstrated combined techniques and new approaches for the handling of municipal sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods include mechanical grinding (Izumi et al, 2010), ultrasound (Elbeshbishy et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2014), microwave (Marin et al, 2010(Marin et al, , 2011, thermal (Liu et al, 2012;Tampio et al, 2014;Ariunbaatar et al, 2014b), chemical (Elbeshbishy et al, 2011;Ma et al, 2011), biological (Vavouraki et al, 2014) pretreatments or their combination (Strong and Gapes, 2012;Vavouraki et al, 2013). Among these methods, thermal pretreatment (TP) is considered as an economically viable and environmentally friendly alternative, as reported by different authors (Strong et al, 2011;Gianico et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2013;Ariunbaatar et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported for FW/OF-MSW [32]. This lower CH4 potential could be due to the removed carbohydrate contents of the waste, supplied as hydrolysates for R. glutinis cultivation in the previous experiments, which has been reported in association with the removal of organic material removal following pre-treatment of organic waste [50]. In the context of the proposed bio-refinery concept, the actual CH4 potential of recycled RS from the hydrolysates of CRFW will require experimental validation.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Residual Solids and Bioenergy Potentialmentioning
confidence: 80%