Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and Attributing Traits in  Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Yadav, Bhumika; Sao, Abhinav; Gauraha, Deepak

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.235

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, these crosses could be exploited to obtain desirable recombinants from the distinct population and utilized for improving heterosis and achieving high-yielding genotypes. Similar findings for the identification crosses based on SCA effects for yield and its components in pea were also reported by Enrique et al [44], Kosev et al [45], Sharma et al [46], Manjunath et al [41], Katoch et al [47] and Yadav et al [13]. Our results illustrated that some specific cross combinations exhibiting highly positive SCA for various traits were characterized by both parents possessing good GCA.…”

Section: Combining Ability Effectssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The presence of these significant GCA effects suggests the potential for ongoing advancements in yield and its associated traits through targeted breeding efforts within the field pea. These outcomes are consistent with the conclusions drawn by Yadav et al [13], Kumar et al [40], Manjunath et al [41] and Kumar et al [42].The parents Aman and P-1297-97 displayed significant positive GCA effects for SY, indicating that these genotypes could be used as good general combiners for higher seed yield in the breeding program. In addition, GCA effects showed that genotypes P-1426, P-92-97-11, HFP-1314 and P-12-97-97 were good general combiners for early flowering; P-1426, P-1297-97 and Vikas were good general combiners for dwarf plant stature; Aman, P-1541-16 and P-92-97-11 were good general combiners for TNP and NEP; and P-1426 and Aman were good general combiners for long PL and NSP.…”

Section: Combining Ability Effectssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…These findings of good combining parents for the traits concerned suggest the predominance of additive effect and additive × additive gene action [10,26]. These findings presented an improvement over earlier studies, wherein no individual parental line was identified as a strong general combiner for some yield-related traits, as indicated by Yadav et al [13], Kumar et al [40] and Manjunath et al [41]. A good combining parent leads to a higher frequency of heterotic crosses than a poor combining parent [43].…”

Section: Combining Ability Effectsmentioning

confidence: 62%

“…Using diallel analysis as suggested by Griffing [10], plant breeders may make decisions about the selection of parental genotypes to use for hybridization and the development of desired transgressive segregants. Previously, the diallel mating design has been employed to investigate the yield and agronomic characteristics of field pea [11][12][13][14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Assessment of Gene Action and Identification of Heterotic Hybrids for Enhancing Yield in Field Pea

Yadav,

Sharma,

Kumar

et al. 2023

Horticulturae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eight field pea parental lines and their twenty-eight F1s resulting from diallel design (excluding reciprocal) were analyzed for their combining ability and heterosis for yield and associated traits. ANOVA revealed significant variation among parents and among hybrids for days to 50% flowering, plant height, total number of pods, effective pods, seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, biological yield and seed yield; pod length also revealed significant differences among hybrids, suggesting the occurrence of considerable variability for studied traits. Crosses P-1541-16 × P-92-97-11 and P-1541-16 × P-1297-97 displayed significant heterosis over better-parent and control varieties for seed yield and associated traits. Combining ability analysis showedthat SCAvariance was considerably higher than corresponding GCAvariance for all traits. Genotype Aman and P-1297-97 were identified as good general combiners for seed yield, while cross P-1541-16 × P-1297-97, Aman × EC-564817, P-1541-16 × P-92-97-11 and P-1297-97 × P-92-97-11 were identified as specific cross-combiners for most of the studied traits. Consequently, these crosses might be exploited in future breeding programs to find desired segregants. PCA explained 81.68% and 83.34% variability in parents and crosses, respectively, for yield component. Furthermore, trait association between GCA effects and SCA effects demonstrates that biological yield, total number of pods, and effective pods exhibit additive gene action, but 100-seed weight exhibits non-additive gene action.

show abstract

Section: Combining Ability Effectssupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Combining Ability Effectssupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Combining Ability Effectsmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessment of Gene Action and Identification of Heterotic Hybrids for Enhancing Yield in Field Pea

Yadav,

Sharma,

Kumar

et al. 2023

Horticulturae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Estimation of Heterosis and the Combining Ability Effect for Yield and Its Attributes in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using PCA and GGE Biplots

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is a highly nutritious winter-season pulse crop. It is used as food, feed, and fodder and offers nutritional security to low-income people in developing countries. Different graphical approaches like Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Genotype + Genotype × Environment (GGE) biplots were used along with the conventional line × tester to identify efficient parents, combining ability effects and distinct heterotic groups in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). The study used a line tester design (9 × 3) for seed yield and its associated traits. In the conventional analysis, lines Aman and HFP 715 and the tester GP02/1108, as well as crosses HFP 715 × GP02/1108, Aman × GP02/1108, and Pant P-243 × HFP 1426 showed the best GCA (General Combining Ability) and SCA (Specific Combining Ability) effects, respectively, for seed yield and its attributes. The σ2SCA > σ2GCA, and σ2D > σ2A in almost all the traits indicated control of non-additive gene effects. High manifestations of heterobeltiosis for seed yield were evidenced by the superiority of 24 out of 27 crosses over the better parent. The highest significant heterobeltiosis was observed in the cross HFP 715 × GP02/1108, followed by IPF 14-16 × GP02/1108, IPF 14-16 × HFP 1426, DDR-23 × HFP 1426, DDR-23 × GP02/1108, and Aman × GP02/1108 for yield and its attributes. The biplot techniques were used to analyze data and compare their results with conventional line × tester analysis. Overall, graphical analysis results were very similar to those of traditional analysis. Consequently, it can surely be assumed that these methods could be helpful in presenting data from field pea breeding experiments carried out with line × tester design.

show abstract

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and Attributing Traits in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Assessment of Gene Action and Identification of Heterotic Hybrids for Enhancing Yield in Field Pea

Assessment of Gene Action and Identification of Heterotic Hybrids for Enhancing Yield in Field Pea

Estimation of Heterosis and the Combining Ability Effect for Yield and Its Attributes in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using PCA and GGE Biplots

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About