2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining “carrot and stick” to incentivize sustainability in households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with these findings, Mahmoodi, Prasanna, Hille, Patel, and Brosch (2018) found that consumers' tariff choices were largely influenced by the incentive components embedded in the tariff design. Overall, consumers preferred electricity tariffs that applied rewards for consumption decreases, rather than penalties for consumption increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In line with these findings, Mahmoodi, Prasanna, Hille, Patel, and Brosch (2018) found that consumers' tariff choices were largely influenced by the incentive components embedded in the tariff design. Overall, consumers preferred electricity tariffs that applied rewards for consumption decreases, rather than penalties for consumption increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Again emphasizing the importance of loss aversion, loss averse people who opt for an electricity-saving tariff have a preference for tariffs without potential financial penalties. Therefore, while adding a financial penalty may be an effective way to promote energy saving (Prasanna et al, 2018;Mahmoodi et al, 2018) and is indeed considered an attractive tariff element by some consumers (such as Segment 5 in the current study), a financial penalty is perceived as repelling by most potential subscribers.…”
Section: Adapted From Thøgersen (2006) Personal Norms Zmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As losses loom larger than gains (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979), imposing a fine in case a target is missed may be a stronger incentive than a potential reward for reaching a similar target. Based on a stated-choice experiment, Mahmoodi et al (2018) indeed find that penalties have a stronger influence than rewards in the choice of an electricity tariff.…”
Section: Combining Goal Setting With Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Foi proposta a arquitetura de um medidor inteligente residencial e uma pesquisa de mercado na região metropolitana de Florianópolis para identificar a configuração adequada do equipamento neste mercado. Pra tanto foi realizada uma pesquisa de mercado utilizando a técnica de Análise Conjunta baseada em Escolhas (ACBE) (MAHMOODI et al, 2018), para estimar a preferência do consumidor sobre os vários atributos do produto (GREEN et al, 2001. Outro atributo é o preço (E), cuja finalidade é entender seu efeito na escolha do cliente (MAHMOODI, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…As pesquisas que utilizam análise conjunta recomendam testar o principal efeito dos atributos e a interação desses atributos com variáveis moderadoras, que descrevem o perfil do cliente (CALEGARI et al, 2018, NAES et al, 2010. Estudos sobre medidores inteligentes residências indicam que várias características dos clientes influenciam na eficiência do uso do medidor, tais como o gênero (ALBANI et al, 2017), despesas com os recursos (GANS et al, 2013) e a renda (MAHMOODI et al, 2018).…”
Section: Arquitetura Do Medidor Inteligenteunclassified