Combining criteria for delineating lahar- and flash-flood-prone hazard and risk zones for the city of Arequipa, Peru

Abstract

International audienceArequipa, the second largest city in Peru, is exposed to many natural hazards, most notably earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, lahars (volcanic debris flows), and flash floods. Of these, lahars and flash floods, triggered by occasional torrential rainfall, pose the most frequently occurring hazards that can affect the city and its environs, in particular the areas containing low-income neighbourhoods. This paper presents and discusses criteria for delineating areas prone to flash flood and lahar hazards, which are localized along the usually dry (except for the rainy season) ravines and channels of the R'ıo Chili and its tributaries that dissect the city. Our risk-evaluation study is based mostly on field surveys and mapping, but we also took into account quality and structural integrity of buildings, available socioeconomic data, and information gained from interviews with risk-managers officials. In our evaluation of the vulnerability of various parts of the city, in addition to geological and physical parameters, we also took into account selected socio-economic parameters, such as the educational and poverty level of the population, unemployment figures, and population density. In addition, we utilized a criterion of the "isolation factor", based on distances to access emergency resources (hospitals, shelters or safety areas, and water) in each city block. By combining the hazard, vulnerability and exposure criteria, we produced detailed risk-zone maps at the city-block scale, covering the whole city of Arequipa and adjacent suburbs. Not surprisingly, these maps show that the areas at high risk coincide with blocks or districts with populations at low socioeconomic levels. Inhabitants at greatest risk are the poor recent immigrants from rural areas who live in unauthorized settlements in the outskirts of the city in the upper parts of the valleys. Such settlements are highly exposed to natural hazards and have little access to vital resources. Our study provides good rationale for the risk zoning of the city, which in turn may be used as an educational tool for better understanding the potential effects of natural hazards and the exposure of the population residing in and around Arequipa.We hope that our work and the risk-zonation maps will provide the impetus and basis for risk-management authorities of the Municipality and the regional government of Arequipa to enforce existing regulations in building in hazardous zones and to adopt an effective long-term strategy to reduce risk

Examining the impact of lahars on buildings using numerical modelling

“…Studies simplifying vulnerability as a relative index use a combination of qualitative and quantitative metrics obtained through building surveys, interpretation of remote sensing data and GIS techniques to map and analyse vulnerability on a large scale (e.g. Lavigne, 1999;Künzler et al, 2012;Galderisi et al, 2013;Thouret et al, 2013Thouret et al, , 2014Ettinger et al, 2015). These methods can be applied to understand and highlight spatial patterns in vulnerability; however, as a relative measure, they cannot provide guidance on absolute damage for any specific event.…”

The role of individuals’ risk representations in risk management - case-study on lahars in Arequipa (Peru)

“…In this context, the questionnaire used is based on a literature review of previous studies on risk perception (Barberi et al 2008;Carlino et al, 2008;Haynes et al, 2008;Nathan 2009) and a detailed socio-economic analysis of the local context done in the framework of the Laharisks Program (Enjolras et al 2012;Thouret et al 2013). It allows us to choose the most relevant formulations adapted to the local context and cross our results with studies implemented in other social and cultural contexts to test their validity.…”

A framework for the science contribution in climate adaptation: Experiences from science-policy processes in the Andes

“…Evans et al, 2009;Pierson et al, 1990;Terlien, 1997;Thouret et al, 1990;Vilimek et al, 2005). Studies that focus on policy relevant aspects such as hazard and risk mapping, or produce a basis for early warning systems are more rare but corresponding efforts have recently been strengthened (Huggel et al, 2010;Kü nzler et al, 2012;Schneider et al, 2014;Thouret et al, 2013).…”