1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0054167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining finite automata, parallel programs and SDL using Petri nets

Abstract: Abstract.This paper introduces a method to combine finite automata, parallel programs and SDL (Specification and Description Language) specifications. We base our approach on M-nets exploiting the rich set of composition operators available in this algebra of high-level Petri nets. In order to be able to combine different modelling techniques, we rely on compatible interfaces. Therefore, -we extend an existing semantics, namely the M-net semantics for the parallel programming language B(PN)2; and -we present a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…statecharts). One approach to combine semantically several specification languages is elaborated in [7].…”
Section: Sdl-example and Discussion Of The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…statecharts). One approach to combine semantically several specification languages is elaborated in [7].…”
Section: Sdl-example and Discussion Of The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The description of the refinement capabilities is based upon the set of all types of interface graphs GT and the set of all types of nodes V T which are defined in an application. In the PLC-example the graph types GT = {SystemDiagram, PLCAutomaton, PLCSubAutomaton} and the node types V T = {SystemNode, PLCState} are used.…”
Section: Descriptions Of Generic Hierarchical Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Those models are not able to model workflow patterns representing parallelism. This problem has been treated and solved in many papers [13] [12] [15] [20] defining an improvement of the Determinist Finite Automata that presents an automaton with capability to execute parallel activities, keeping the complexity at regular level. In spite of this, those systems are no capable to represent time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, by combining dynamic digraph with hybrid automata and applying the parallel composition law between hybrid automata [ 32 , 33 ], we can obtain a new networked model and name it Dynamic Graph Hybrid Automata (DGHA). As an independent model framework, the DGHA can be applied in various dynamic network systems with multi-mode switchings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%