2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2008.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining logical and algebraic techniques for natural style proving in elementary analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined methods like the PCS method introduced by Buchberger [10], [16] or the S-Decomposition strategy with extended quantifier elimination [17], [29] supports the investigation of proving problems in the CreaComp elementary analysis units. Extended quantifier elimination over reals enables to solve quantified parametric polynomial constraints, i.e., for finding witness terms for existentially quantified variables in the goal.…”
Section: Reasoning Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined methods like the PCS method introduced by Buchberger [10], [16] or the S-Decomposition strategy with extended quantifier elimination [17], [29] supports the investigation of proving problems in the CreaComp elementary analysis units. Extended quantifier elimination over reals enables to solve quantified parametric polynomial constraints, i.e., for finding witness terms for existentially quantified variables in the goal.…”
Section: Reasoning Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both contain proofs, but they look very different. Such variety is a significant challenge in general, although it is certainly possible to assess proof in particular constrained areas of mathematics using specially-designed tools (e.g., Gruttmann et al, 2008;Vajda, 2009;Vajda et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future we will also consider problems involving satisfiability tests for formulae with (alternations) of quantifiers. We would like to analyze the possible links between our approach and the method for automated reasoning in analysis described in [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%