Combining Multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences Provides Independent Reproducible Radiomics Features

Abstract

To evaluate the relative contribution of different Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences for the extraction of radiomics features in a cohort of patients with lacrimal gland tumors. This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and signed informed consent was obtained from all participants. From December 2015 to April 2017, 37 patients with lacrimal gland lesions underwent MRI before surgery, including axial T1-WI, axial Diffusion-WI, coronal DIXON-T2-WI and coronal post-contrast DIXON-T1-WI. Two readers manually delineated both lacrimal glands to assess inter-observer reproducibility, and one reader performed two successive delineations to assess intra-observer reproducibility. Radiomics features were extracted using an in-house software to calculate 85 features per region-of-interest (510 features/patient). Reproducible features were defined as features presenting both an intra-class correlation coefficient ≥0.8 and a concordance correlation coefficient ≥0.9 across combinations of the three delineations. Among these features, the ones yielding redundant information were identified as clusters using hierarchical clustering based on the Spearman correlation coefficient. All the MR sequences provided reproducible radiomics features (range 14(16%)−37(44%)) and non-redundant clusters (range 5–14). The highest numbers of features and clusters were provided by the water and in-phase DIXON T2-WI and water and in-phase post-contrast DIXON T1-WI (37, 26, 26 and 26 features and 14,12, 9 and 11 clusters, respectively). A total of 145 reproducible features grouped into 51 independent clusters was provided by pooling all the MR sequences. All MRI sequences provided reproducible radiomics features yielding independent information which could potentially serve as biomarkers.

Standardization of brain MR images across machines and protocols: bridging the gap for MRI-based radiomics

“…3, S1 and S2), a number of bins equal to 32 seems to be a good compromise for brain MR analysis after Z-Score normalization, as it leads to the most informative radiomics signatures for both sequences, with acceptable calculation times. Preliminary feature selection based on robustness is widely used in radiomics 45,46 . In the present study, no improvements in classification performances were observed using feature selection ( Figure S2, Table 4).…”

Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma

“…Radiomics features, reliability and reproducibility can be affected by various aspects of radiomics processing (e.g., image acquisition parameters and protocols, image preprocessing algorithms, tumor segmentation, and software used for processing and feature extractions). Major of radiomics studies by concerning a different aspect of radiomics reproducibility and repeatability issue was done in computed tomography (CT) and PET modalities for limited cancer types, and a few studies have been reported in MRI …”

Radiogenomics: bridging imaging and genomics

“…Typically, robust biomarkers are derived from large heterogeneous datasets with a methodical testing process and external validation. Currently, literature has shown that radiomic features can be influenced by many parameters such as scanning equipment [187,188], image pre-processing [189], acquisition protocols [190,191], image reconstruction algorithms [13,192,193], and delineation [194,195] among others. These changes can subsequently impact the radiomic predictive models.…”