2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74817-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Multiple Web Accessibility Evaluation Reports Using Semantic Web Technologies

Abstract: This paper describes a process for automatic combination of testing reports for the accessibility of Web applications, obtained by different testing tools and applying different standards on Web accessibility. Interoperability is guaranteed using semantic Web technologies, which allow describing the reports by RDF (Resource Description Framework) triples. The reports refer to elements of a knowledge base consisting of vocabularies, ontologies and rules of inference, in which the conceptual relations between ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researcher has effectively tried the functionality on the web page only in the case of a selection of items, more often with the items concerning screen reader (audio control) or keyboard accessibility. The assessment has been conducted both manually, as well as with the support of online tools, such as the ones available at www.accessibilitychecker.org, audit.deque.com/or waveweb accessibility evaluation tool -wave.webaim.org/, in line with previous studies conducted on this topic [34,35,36,37]. We consider that a combination between results yielded by automatic assessment, with reduced subjectivity but limited on the type of signaled errors, alongside manual checking (although associated with increased subjectivity) is able to provide, from the methodological point of view, more accurate results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher has effectively tried the functionality on the web page only in the case of a selection of items, more often with the items concerning screen reader (audio control) or keyboard accessibility. The assessment has been conducted both manually, as well as with the support of online tools, such as the ones available at www.accessibilitychecker.org, audit.deque.com/or waveweb accessibility evaluation tool -wave.webaim.org/, in line with previous studies conducted on this topic [34,35,36,37]. We consider that a combination between results yielded by automatic assessment, with reduced subjectivity but limited on the type of signaled errors, alongside manual checking (although associated with increased subjectivity) is able to provide, from the methodological point of view, more accurate results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And most importantlyat a time when the student is more comfortable doing it. Based on this, it is currently impossible to do without the use of computer technology in the acquisition of knowledge [10] - [13], [14]. How to introduce computer technology into the educational process is a decision and the specifics of a particular discipline.…”
Section: Peculiar Properties Of Traditional and Distance Learning Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%