2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-017-0573-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining residue analysis of floors and ceramics for the study of activity areas at the Garum Shop at Pompeii

Abstract: the ERAAUB, Consolidated Group (2014 SGR 845); the Ramon y Cajal contract (RYC 2013-13369). These results are also part of the on-going projects HAR-43599-P &

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, all the amphorae which contained tartaric acid—that is, grapevine products with or without other substances (Chian amphorae P0841/BRI_104, P0746a/BRI_108, and P0293/BRI_110, torpedo jar P174/BRI_125, and Rhodian amphora 468/BRI_126)—are sealed with conifer exudates, but not the amphora that contained plant oil (Samian amphora 551 P46/BRI_95). While recent evidence indicates at least some fish sauce amphorae were also lined, resinous linings may have been more permeable than previously thought, and reuse of pine tar‐lined amphorae appears to have been commonplace (Garnier et al, 2009; Romanus et al, 2009; Pecci et al, 2018, 2021), our data agree with historical sources which mention that oil amphora are not pitched, unlike wine amphorae (Brun, 2003; Heron & Pollard, 1988). Conifer products were an important commodity in the ancient world; when Polybius describes gifts given by Antigonus to the people of Rhodes, he lists ‘a thousand talents of pitch; [and] a thousand amphorae of the same unboiled’ (Polybius, Histories , 5.29).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, all the amphorae which contained tartaric acid—that is, grapevine products with or without other substances (Chian amphorae P0841/BRI_104, P0746a/BRI_108, and P0293/BRI_110, torpedo jar P174/BRI_125, and Rhodian amphora 468/BRI_126)—are sealed with conifer exudates, but not the amphora that contained plant oil (Samian amphora 551 P46/BRI_95). While recent evidence indicates at least some fish sauce amphorae were also lined, resinous linings may have been more permeable than previously thought, and reuse of pine tar‐lined amphorae appears to have been commonplace (Garnier et al, 2009; Romanus et al, 2009; Pecci et al, 2018, 2021), our data agree with historical sources which mention that oil amphora are not pitched, unlike wine amphorae (Brun, 2003; Heron & Pollard, 1988). Conifer products were an important commodity in the ancient world; when Polybius describes gifts given by Antigonus to the people of Rhodes, he lists ‘a thousand talents of pitch; [and] a thousand amphorae of the same unboiled’ (Polybius, Histories , 5.29).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the chemical nature of the layers spread on the porous pottery to make it suitable to conserve and to transport liquid foodstuff can be elucidated [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In addition to recognising lining materials, the versatility of archaeometric approaches has been proved to be quite signi cant to tackle vessel function: by investigating organic residues in transport vessels, analytical techniques can contribute further information that support the archaeological approach in shedding light on past trade [2,3,5,[10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it better survives upon archaeological time compared to other grape acids [9]. For this reason, it is usually considered as a grape biomarker when supported by archaeological contexts and/or archaeobotanical grape evidence [3,11,12,22]. Although synthesized by numerous plants and fungi, pyruvic, fumaric and malic acids are additionally produced during the fermentation process [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%