Combining robot-assisted therapy with virtual reality or using it alone? A systematic review on health-related quality of life in neurological patients

Abstract

Background In the field of neurorehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy (RAT) and virtual reality (VR) have so far shown promising evidence on multiple motor and functional outcomes. The related effectiveness on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been investigated across neurological populations but still remains unclear. The present study aimed to systematically review the studies investigating the effects of RAT alone and with VR on HRQoL in patients with different neurological diseases. Methods A systematic review of the studies evaluating the impact of RAT alone and combined with VR on HRQoL in patients affected by neurological diseases (i.e., stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, Parkinson’s Disease) was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and PsychINFO (2000–2022) were performed. Risk of bias was evaluated through the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Descriptive data regarding the study design, participants, intervention, rehabilitation outcomes, robotic device typology, HRQoL measures, non-motor factors concurrently investigated, and main results were extracted and meta-synthetized. Results The searches identified 3025 studies, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria. An overall heterogeneous configuration was found regarding the study design adopted, intervention procedures and technological devices implemented, rehabilitation outcomes (i.e., related to both upper and lower limb impairment), HRQoL measures administered, and main evidence. Most of the studies reported significant effects of both RAT and RAT plus VR on patients HRQoL, whether they adopted generic or disease-specific HRQoL measures. Significant post-intervention within-group changes were mainly found across neurological populations, while fewer studies reported significant between-group comparisons, and then, mostly in patients with stroke. Longitudinal investigations were also observed (up to 36 months), but significant longitudinal effects were exclusively found in patients with stroke or multiple sclerosis. Finally, concurrent evaluations on non-motor outcomes beside HRQoL included cognitive (i.e., memory, attention, executive functions) and psychological (i.e., mood, satisfaction with the treatment, device usability, fear of falling, motivation, self-efficacy, coping, and well-being) variables. Conclusions Despite the heterogeneity observed among the studies included, promising evidence was found on the effectiveness of RAT and RAT plus VR on HRQoL. However, further targeted short- and long-term investigations, are strongly recommended for specific HRQoL subcomponents and neurological populations, through the adoption of defined intervention procedures and disease-specific assessment methodology.

Improving Outcomes in People with Spinal Cord Injury: Encouraging Results from a Multidisciplinary Advanced Rehabilitation Pathway

“…Investigating users' perceptions of neurorehabilitation is pivotal, as patients' motivation significantly predicts long-term changes in quality of life and rehabilitation outcomes [7]. Previous research confirmed that the combined use of conventional methods and technological devices could maximize rehabilitation effectiveness [60,[62][63][64]. Furthermore, our findings highlighted the satisfaction of patients with the multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment and their active involvement in the recovery process.…”

“…In line with these concerns, we have observed that the combined use of innovative rehabilitation with other interventions can contribute to a reduction in depressive symptoms. Indeed, the combination of robot-assisted therapy and VR has been shown to stand out as an innovative approach with substantial benefits for improving mood and alleviating depressive symptoms in patients with different neurological disorders [60]. While studies have traditionally focused on outcomes related to motor improvement and change in functional status, robotics and VR, alone or in combination, have shown a broader impact on the mental health and psychological well-being of individuals.…”

To Reach the Unreachable: Exploring the Potential of VR Hand Redirection for Upper Limb Rehabilitation

“…Zimmerli et al highlighted the pivotal role of interactivity (ie, functional feedback to motor performance) of VR in engaging patients in rehabilitation [86]. Other studies showcase the effectiveness of combining VR with other approaches, such as conventional physical therapy [34,36,59,61,70], robotic-assisted rehabilitation [11,67,83], and exoskeletons [26,41,76] in improving motor functions.…”

Robotic systems for upper-limb rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a SWOT analysis and the synergies with virtual and augmented environments

“…Notably, Zanatta et al, 2023a , Zanatta et al, 2023b , Zanatta et al, 2022 ) explored the potential of combining robotic and virtual systems in rehabilitation, by analyzing their practical implications. The authors proposed a biopsychological approach to examine the points of view offered by multiple health-related perspectives, according to diverse technological solutions and heterogeneous conditions.…”