Combining static and dynamic variables in species distribution models under climate change

Abstract

Summary1. Methods used to predict shifts in species' ranges because of climate change commonly involve species distribution (niche) modelling using climatic variables, future values of which are predicted for the next several decades by general circulation models. However, species' distributions also depend on factors other than climate, such as land cover, land use and soil type. Changes in some of these factors, such as soil type, occur over geologic time and are thus imperceptible over the timescale of these types of projections. Other factors, such as land use and land cover, are expected to change over shorter timescales, but reliable projections are not available. Some important predictor variables, therefore, must be treated as unchanging, or static, whether because of the properties of the variable or out of necessity. The question of how best to combine dynamic variables predicted by climate models with static variables is not trivial and has been dealt with differently in studies to date. Alternative methods include using the static variables as masks, including them as independent explanatory variables in the model, or excluding them altogether. 2. Using a set of simulated species, we tested various methods for combining static variables with future climate scenarios. Our results showed that including static variables in the model with the dynamic variables performed better or no worse than either masking or excluding the static variables. 3. The difference in predictive ability was most pronounced when there is an interaction between the static and dynamic variables. 4. For variables such as land use, our results indicate that if such variables affect species distributions, including them in the model is better than excluding them, even though this may mean making the unrealistic assumption that the variable will not change in the future. 5. These results demonstrate the importance of including static and dynamic non-climate variables in addition to climate variables in species distribution models designed to predict future change in a species' habitat or distribution as a result of climate change.

Adapted conservation measures are required to save the Iberian lynx in a changing climate

“…As land-use modification has left a strong historical legacy on the distribution of Iberian lynx and rabbits 8 , this information was used to constrain the suitability of ENM predictions, both for the present-day and future 29 . Our projections assume that lynx and rabbits will conserve their climatic-habitat preferences in the future and that land-use remains spatially constant.…”

Climate change threatens giant panda protection in the 21st century

“…All spatial layers of these environmental variables were resampled to a resolution of 30 s to correspond to that of bioclimatic variables. Because reliable future projections of these variables (land cover, distance from residential areas, and roads) are not available, and because including static variables in SDMs alongside dynamic variables can improve model performance (Stanton et al, 2012), we kept these variables static in our projections.…”

Climate change and conservation implications for wet meadows in dry Patagonia

“…Including static variables in SDMs when assessing climate-change effects on species distributions may improve model outputs (Stanton et al 2012). Stanton et al (2012) suggested excluding static variables highly correlated with climate variables, but that have indirect effects on the species distribution, such as altitude.…”