2021
DOI: 10.1364/ol.424000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining time of flight and photometric stereo imaging for 3D reconstruction of discontinuous scenes

Abstract: Time of flight and photometric stereo are two three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques with complementary properties, where the former can achieve depth accuracy in discontinuous scenes, and the latter can reconstruct surfaces of objects with fine depth details and high spatial resolution. In this work, we demonstrate the surface reconstruction of complex 3D fields with discontinuity between objects by combining the two imaging methods. Using commercial LEDs, a single-photon avalanche diode camera, and a mobi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 67 ] However, the traditional method is costly, and the operation is quite complicated. For example, time‐of‐flight depth cameras [ 68 , 69 ] consist of components such as light sources, optical elements, sensors, control circuitry, and processing circuitry. These cameras are known for their high cost and using them for sampling 3D scenes can be easily affected by multiple reflections.…”
Section: Computation Of Multi‐depth Diffraction Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 67 ] However, the traditional method is costly, and the operation is quite complicated. For example, time‐of‐flight depth cameras [ 68 , 69 ] consist of components such as light sources, optical elements, sensors, control circuitry, and processing circuitry. These cameras are known for their high cost and using them for sampling 3D scenes can be easily affected by multiple reflections.…”
Section: Computation Of Multi‐depth Diffraction Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Table 2 , compared with other types of detection methods, the designed method has achieved better results, and the number of false detection and missed detection is also at a low level, 140 and 176, respectively [ 29 ]. While AP, precision, and recall reached 90.2%, 95.5%, and 90.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the other four methods.…”
Section: Test Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since it is difficult to distinguish non-destructive defects from destructive defects, the effect of traditional machine vision detection methods in detecting high reflection objects is not ideal. Some scholars suggested using photometric stereo vision or the three-dimensional point cloud measurement method to detect destructive defects [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]. However, photometric stereo vision is suitable for the surface defect detection of diffuse objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%