2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, it may even be most appropriate to use different model approaches to study the same region and to then compare the outcomes of such forecast models, which may lead to a better and more complete understanding of the LULC change process [53]. The method has therefore become an important direction for current research and could involve using a different model in combination with the CLUE-S model, such as the grey interconnect degree, the system dynamics model or multi-agent system models [26], which offer a reasonable alternative to predict and simulate land use patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, it may even be most appropriate to use different model approaches to study the same region and to then compare the outcomes of such forecast models, which may lead to a better and more complete understanding of the LULC change process [53]. The method has therefore become an important direction for current research and could involve using a different model in combination with the CLUE-S model, such as the grey interconnect degree, the system dynamics model or multi-agent system models [26], which offer a reasonable alternative to predict and simulate land use patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslide susceptibility reflects the degree to which terrain unit can be affected by slope movements in the future (Günther et al, 2013). 15 In general, the choice of geoinformation (GI) details for the landslide predisposing factors are not often explained in the landslide susceptibility assessment based on statistical methods; or some criteria defined in the literature is used for this selection, since these variables explain the occurrence of slope movements in the study area (Blahut et al, 2010;Carrara et al, 1991;Castella et al, 2007;Castellanos Abella, 2008;Guzzetti et al, 1999Guzzetti et al, , 2006Soeters and van Westen, 1996;van Westen et al, 2008;20 Zêzere et al, 2008Zêzere et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predisposing factor maps (PFM) were selected after literature reviewing about the causal factors of landslides occurrence (Blahut et al, 2010;Carrara et al, 1991;Castella et al, 2007;Castellanos Abella, 2008;Guzzetti et al, 1999;Soeters and van Westen, 1996;van Westen et al, 2008;Zêzere et al, 2008Zêzere et al, , 2017. The PFM selected to the landslide susceptibility modeling in Zêzere watershed are presented in Figure 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much research has been conducted on topics related to the natural sciences, fewer studies have focused on social, economic and integrated studies. As a result, this mismatch could potentially lead to improper and unspecific political decisions, often implying a "one-size-fits-all" policy design and implementation [23], while increasing the risk of failing to consider an integrative solution for sustainable development in general [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%