2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2020.100759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Molecular identification of seven new Zygopteran genera from South China through partial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, all these results indicate the importance of performing careful morphological analysis (see this kind of problem in [66]). Moreover, as indicated by Koroiva and Kvist [38], it reinforces that the use of the global database does not allow the correct establishment of all molecular identifications to be correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Subsequently, all these results indicate the importance of performing careful morphological analysis (see this kind of problem in [66]). Moreover, as indicated by Koroiva and Kvist [38], it reinforces that the use of the global database does not allow the correct establishment of all molecular identifications to be correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The quality of sequence data depends on many factors and mistakes can occur in any step from specimen collection to final data interpretation. As an example, for resolving taxonomic questions in Odonata by means of DNA barcoding, two main pitfalls have been described: (i) inaccuracies in the identification of voucher specimens and (ii) sequencing errors [54,55]. A recent publication showed that sequences deposited at GenBank described as Odonata specimens were actually dipteran DNA [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, for resolving taxonomic questions in Odonata by means of DNA barcoding, two main pitfalls have been described: (i) inaccuracies in the identification of voucher specimens and (ii) sequencing errors [54,55]. A recent publication showed that sequences deposited at GenBank described as Odonata specimens were actually dipteran DNA [55]. In another example, Lorenzo-Carballa et al identified in a molecular revision of Ischnura aurora questionable DNA sequences [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%