2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00929-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on ‘Reported Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions after Intravenous Iron Administration in the European Economic Area (EEA) Before and After Implementation of Risk Minimization Measures’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large observational claims database retrospective analyses have suggested these reactions may be more frequent with iron dextran vs newer preparations [4] and with ferumoxytol vs iron sucrose (see Supplementary Table S5 in Wetmore et al [14]), and pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting database analyses have suggested higher reporting rates with iron dextran, ferumoxytol, and iron isomaltoside than ferric gluconate or ferric carboxymaltose [8,[15][16][17][18]. However, methodological concerns [19][20][21][22][23] and a paucity of longer term data on newer IV iron preparations in many of these publications limit the conclusions that can be reached. Thus, up-to-date analyses are required to further explore signals for potential IV iron-adverse event (AE) associations using established methodologies for analysis of pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting databases [24,25].…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large observational claims database retrospective analyses have suggested these reactions may be more frequent with iron dextran vs newer preparations [4] and with ferumoxytol vs iron sucrose (see Supplementary Table S5 in Wetmore et al [14]), and pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting database analyses have suggested higher reporting rates with iron dextran, ferumoxytol, and iron isomaltoside than ferric gluconate or ferric carboxymaltose [8,[15][16][17][18]. However, methodological concerns [19][20][21][22][23] and a paucity of longer term data on newer IV iron preparations in many of these publications limit the conclusions that can be reached. Thus, up-to-date analyses are required to further explore signals for potential IV iron-adverse event (AE) associations using established methodologies for analysis of pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting databases [24,25].…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%