1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.60.039801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Validity of certain soft photon amplitudes”

Abstract: The criteria suggested by Welsh and Fearing to judge the validity of certain soft-photon amplitudes are examined. We comment on aspects of their analysis which lead to incorrect conclusions about published amplitudes and point out important criteria which were omitted from their analysis.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the accompanying Comment [3] Liou, et al raised two objections to I. While we find these objections invalid, and stand by the conclusions of the original paper, we wish to discuss them, as they reemphasize some of the ambiguities which appear in these generalized SPA's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the accompanying Comment [3] Liou, et al raised two objections to I. While we find these objections invalid, and stand by the conclusions of the original paper, we wish to discuss them, as they reemphasize some of the ambiguities which appear in these generalized SPA's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…6 of Zhang et al (2005)). Typical targets are storms, mesocyclones and tornadoes; to track them effectively at high resolutions (down to 250m), and with a computational efficiency required by realtime applications, the 2dSA uses a small domain (∼20 × 20 km 2 ) in a moving frame following the tracked feature (Gal-Chen 1982;Zhang and Gal-Chen 1996;Liou 1999;Liu et al 2004). Because the 2dSA has a small retrieval domain, it requires suitable analyses of winds at the meso-β and meso-γ scales, or scales larger than those handled by the small domain of 2dSA analysis, to provide background and boundary constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%