2015
DOI: 10.1177/1754073914565520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment: What Does Left–Right Autonomic Asymmetry Signify?

Abstract: The situation-dependent lateralization of sympathetic electrodermal arousal during real-life stress (Picard, Fedor, & Ayzenberg, 2016) may challenge a unitary notion of arousal, and call into question the practice of unilateral electrodermal recording, but there are broader implications. Here we consider a potential relationship between stress-induced lateralized shifts in electrodermal activity, and a theory concerning lateralized emotion-induced cardiac arrhythmia. arousal, brain, cardiovascular, electroderm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The faster SCR may provide additional insights. (6) In the future, EDA should be measured on both hands because the EDA difference between the hands (termed “EDA asymmetry”) is an additional innovative indicator for the state of the ANS 154 157 to potentially capture reactivity to the colors. EDA was only measured on one hand, because the other hand was occupied by the pulse oximetry sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The faster SCR may provide additional insights. (6) In the future, EDA should be measured on both hands because the EDA difference between the hands (termed “EDA asymmetry”) is an additional innovative indicator for the state of the ANS 154 157 to potentially capture reactivity to the colors. EDA was only measured on one hand, because the other hand was occupied by the pulse oximetry sensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested “multiple arousal theory” raised considerable interest and resulted in several commentaries followed by authors’ response (Critchley and Nagai, 2015; Mendes, 2016; Norman, 2016; Picard et al, 2016; Richter, 2016; Sabatinelli, 2016). While these commentaries were in general positive toward the concept of multiple arousal theory, the need for more systematic research including testable and falsifiable predictions has been voiced (Richter, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, a measurable change in EDA is not necessary for arousal (see what follows). Critchley and Nagai's (2016) commentary is fascinating, telling of how asymmetric sympathetic arousal from the right side of the brain is associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Our theory can also make predictions in this case: if the sympathetic activation is strongly right-sided to the heart, then all other sources held constant, we would expect to see EDA also be higher on the right wrist than on the left.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%