1995
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1995.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary and Opinion: II. Statistical Parametric Mapping: Ontology and Current Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical model included high frequency signal filtering (high pass filter = 128 seconds) and the AR1 method of estimating temporal autocorrelation. The time series data were statistically analyzed using the general linear model (Friston, 1995). Two subtractive contrasts were specified per individual analysis: SA versus AVA (contrast coding: 1 1; referred to as SA forthwith) and the inverse, AVA versus SA (contrast coding: -1 -1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical model included high frequency signal filtering (high pass filter = 128 seconds) and the AR1 method of estimating temporal autocorrelation. The time series data were statistically analyzed using the general linear model (Friston, 1995). Two subtractive contrasts were specified per individual analysis: SA versus AVA (contrast coding: 1 1; referred to as SA forthwith) and the inverse, AVA versus SA (contrast coding: -1 -1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation/Deactivation Maps-In order to assess the selective activations and deactivations in individual participants elicited by the combined protocol-driven visual experiments, we applied the standard General Linear Model analysis (Friston, 1995). A boxcar predictor with hemodynamic delay of 3 seconds was constructed for all visual conditions and the model was independently fitted to the time course of each voxel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difference images (fenfluramine minus placebo) were formed, and unpaired t-tests compared patients with volunteers; the threshold of significance was established through a resampling method (Haznedar et al 1997). The t-test manipulation is like that of Friston (1995) but uses an image standardization method utilizing visually identified anatomical landmarks and empirically derived tests of significance based on concurrent data.…”
Section: Statistical Probability Mapping (Spm)mentioning
confidence: 99%