2010
DOI: 10.1109/map.2010.5466419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on “Comments on ‘Measuring the Impedance of Balanced Antennas by an S-Parameter Method’”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, antenna gain is also given in relation to the dipole antenna and expressed in dBd. The energy gain of an antenna is dependent on its directivity and the energy loss of the antenna, which results from the material it is made of [35,37]. The proposed antenna has a gain of 5.06 dBi at a resonance frequency of 28.00 GHz, which is considered to be high for compact microstrip antennas.…”
Section: Antenna Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, antenna gain is also given in relation to the dipole antenna and expressed in dBd. The energy gain of an antenna is dependent on its directivity and the energy loss of the antenna, which results from the material it is made of [35,37]. The proposed antenna has a gain of 5.06 dBi at a resonance frequency of 28.00 GHz, which is considered to be high for compact microstrip antennas.…”
Section: Antenna Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of large discrepancies, it is possible to use a matching system. However, adding another system introduces additional losses and generates additional costs [35][36][37]. The designed width and length of the feed line in the antenna has a complex input impedance of Z = 56.1 + j 5.08 Ω at the resonance frequency of 28.00 GHz, while at 27.50 GHz the complex input impedance is Z = 51.57 − j 10.73 Ω, and at 28.35 GHz the complex input impedance is Z = 59.6 − j 1.39 Ω.…”
Section: Input Impedancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation