2017
DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commercial Probiotic Products

Abstract: Probiotics have been proposed for a number of indications ranging from the hypothetical long-term immunomodulatory effects to proven benefits in the management of different clinical conditions.An increasing number of commercial products containing probiotics are available. In those products, irrespective if it is food, food supplement, medical food, or drug, the probiotic microorganisms have to be present in a sufficient number by the end of the shelf-life, to pass through the gastrointestinal tract resisting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
150
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
150
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, if probiotics are prescribed in the treatment with specific disorders, they should be regulated as drugs rather than foods or supplements. Under this formula, adverse consequences connected to the use of probiotics should be shared and registered by health authorities [220]. Nowadays, probiotic effects seem to be strain specific and dose dependent, and the lack of standardized manufacturing procedures affect multiple factors such as microbial survival, their growth, and their viability [220].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, if probiotics are prescribed in the treatment with specific disorders, they should be regulated as drugs rather than foods or supplements. Under this formula, adverse consequences connected to the use of probiotics should be shared and registered by health authorities [220]. Nowadays, probiotic effects seem to be strain specific and dose dependent, and the lack of standardized manufacturing procedures affect multiple factors such as microbial survival, their growth, and their viability [220].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this formula, adverse consequences connected to the use of probiotics should be shared and registered by health authorities [220]. Nowadays, probiotic effects seem to be strain specific and dose dependent, and the lack of standardized manufacturing procedures affect multiple factors such as microbial survival, their growth, and their viability [220]. At the research level, active work in the field is needed and well-designed studies in the future should also focus on other aspects such as: (i) the efficacy and search of distinct mixtures of strains of probiotic species in the restoration of vaginal microbiota, (ii) a consensus in the duration of the treatment with probiotics and colony-forming units employed for restoration in launched studies, and (iii) a better understanding of the combination of antibiotics and probiotics when both are provided together [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two more terms are useful to understand this opinion: "microbiota, " which is a collective term for the microorganisms that live in or on the human body (specific clusters of microbiota are found on the skin or in the gastrointestinal tract, mouth, vagina, and eyes) and "microbiome, " which comprises all the genetic material within a microbiota (the entire collection of microorganisms in a specific niche, such as the human gut) and which can also be referred to as the metagenome of the microbiota (Rothschild et al, 2018). After the first attempts made by FAO andWHO (Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2002, 2006) to provide health and nutritional information and guidelines to evaluate probiotics, in view of the growing popularity of probiotic foods and the lack of international consensus on the methodology to assess their efficacy and safety, several societies and associations have more recently released a number of guidelines or position papers on this topic (Hill et al, 2014;Kolacek et al, 2017). Despite many attempts made by regulatory bodies (Kolacek et al, 2017), the status of probiotic products has not been established on an international basis-there is no label control and there are no periodic screenings of the products' quality and safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the first attempts made by FAO andWHO (Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2002, 2006) to provide health and nutritional information and guidelines to evaluate probiotics, in view of the growing popularity of probiotic foods and the lack of international consensus on the methodology to assess their efficacy and safety, several societies and associations have more recently released a number of guidelines or position papers on this topic (Hill et al, 2014;Kolacek et al, 2017). Despite many attempts made by regulatory bodies (Kolacek et al, 2017), the status of probiotic products has not been established on an international basis-there is no label control and there are no periodic screenings of the products' quality and safety. Apart from the issues related to hygiene and safety and to the taxonomy, nomenclature, and classification of strains (Aureli et al, 2010;Lefevre et al, 2015;Llewellyn and Foey, 2017;Suez et al, 2018;Zmora et al, 2018), research mainly focuses on the viability and survival of commercial probiotic formulations during their passage through the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract (Drago et al, 2004;Cook et al, 2011;Dominici et al, 2011;Sahadeva et al, 2011;Jensen et al, 2012;Fredua-Agyeman and Gaisford, 2014;Vecchione et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation