2015
DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common bile duct diameter in an asymptomatic population: A magnetic resonance imaging study

Abstract: We established a reference range for the CBD diameter on MRCP for an asymptomatic population. The CBD diameter is correlated with age. Respiration did not affect the non-dilated CBD diameter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Available literature suggests that in presumably healthy individuals, the upper limit of extrahepatic, right hepatic and the left hepatic bile duct is 6.0, 3.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively34,35 . We have adhered to these width limits in the present study and believe that a positive MRC examination indicates pathological bile ducts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available literature suggests that in presumably healthy individuals, the upper limit of extrahepatic, right hepatic and the left hepatic bile duct is 6.0, 3.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively34,35 . We have adhered to these width limits in the present study and believe that a positive MRC examination indicates pathological bile ducts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the approach in this research can be considered as the first one that uses DnCNN to remove noise from bile duct MR images. [32] introduced a fruitful study about processing the Magnetic Resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images to measure the bile duct diameter. The authors in [33] followed an approach to check the efficiency of the DnCNN by introducing some artificial noise to be corrected, and in the results, they obtained very small variations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CBD greater then 6mm, is classified as dilated and increases likelihood of CBD stones (EASL, 2016), estimated to be present in 10-20% of symptomatic individuals (Williams et al, 2017). Factors such as age, previous cholecystectomy and BMI all significantly affect the diameter of the CBD (Peng et al 2015) therefore, individualistic interpretation is required. In this case, with stated factors considered and in combination with liver function test (LFT) derangement there was high probability of the presence of CBD stones.…”
Section: Common Bile Duct Sizementioning
confidence: 99%