2020
DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2020.1741785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common factors and spatial dependence: an application to US house prices

Abstract: This paper considers panel data models with cross-sectional dependence arising from both spatial autocorrelation and unobserved common factors. It derives conditions for model identification and proposes estimation methods that employ cross-sectional averages as factor proxies, including the 2SLS, Best 2SLS, and GMM estimations. The proposed estimators are robust to unknown heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in the disturbances, unrequired to estimate the number of unknown factors, and computationally t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial parameter estimates are positive and statistically significant for all regions. The average estimate of the spatial lag obtained for the U.S. (around 0.51) is lower than the estimate of around 0.65 reported by Yang (2018) who considers a homogeneous SAR specification estimated on a similar data set. The differences between the two estimates could be due to the considerable degree of heterogeneity that we observe across the regions in the U.S., which is being neglected under the homogeneity assumption.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Spatial parameter estimates are positive and statistically significant for all regions. The average estimate of the spatial lag obtained for the U.S. (around 0.51) is lower than the estimate of around 0.65 reported by Yang (2018) who considers a homogeneous SAR specification estimated on a similar data set. The differences between the two estimates could be due to the considerable degree of heterogeneity that we observe across the regions in the U.S., which is being neglected under the homogeneity assumption.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…BHP distinguish between spatial dependence that originates from economy-wide common shocks such as changes in interest rates, oil prices and technology, and the dependence across MSAs due to local spill-over effects arising from differences in house prices, incomes and demographics across MSAs. 13 Here, we use an extended version of the panel dataset employed by BHP and further augmented with population and per capita real income data by Yang (2018) to estimate HSAR models, after filtering out the effects of common factors on house price changes. 14 We provide MSA specific estimates of spill-over effects, as well as population and income elasticities of house prices as compared to the homogeneous spatial parameter estimates obtained in Yang (2018).…”
Section: Heterogeneous Spatial Spill-over Effects In Us Housing Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations