2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00013-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common property and natural resources in the Alps: the decay of management structures?

Abstract: Local-authority and collective forms of ownership still tend to dominate in the Alpine regions. This article concentrates on collective ownership or common property in the Alps and poses the question as to its importance with respect to the sustainable use of natural resources in the mountain regions. The concept of common property or collective ownership is explained in the first part of the article and the advantages and disadvantages of this ideal type of regulatory system, at least as presented in the lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficult and slow progress in rethinking membership rules and renegotiating the balance between equity and sustainable resource use at a local level show that the paradigmatic narrative of commons as ideal communities or an 'ideal regulatory system' (Kissling-Näf et al, 2002) should not always be taken for granted. In addition, at a higher institutional level, it appears that the action of the State cannot simply be translated into top-down measures, but requires long-term adaptation of all nested levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Difficult and slow progress in rethinking membership rules and renegotiating the balance between equity and sustainable resource use at a local level show that the paradigmatic narrative of commons as ideal communities or an 'ideal regulatory system' (Kissling-Näf et al, 2002) should not always be taken for granted. In addition, at a higher institutional level, it appears that the action of the State cannot simply be translated into top-down measures, but requires long-term adaptation of all nested levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a tradition of forest communities and community forestry throughout Europe (Jeanrenaud, 2001;Bravo and De Moor, 2008;Lawrence et al, 2009;Holmgren et al, 2010;Rubio-Perez and Fernándeza, 2013). In particular, the Alps are the setting for many ancient, traditional and recentlyre-established forest commons (Netting, 1976;Kissling-Näf et al, 2002). They have been exposed to centuries of complex history and many political and economic changes, sometimes leading to destitution or poor functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional response to appropriation action situation: For centuries local governance systems have avoided overuse of the meadows by strictly defining (1) the distribution of use rights and yield, i.e., number of cows allowed on the pastures and distribution among farmers); (2) the duties connected to the use of the resource, e.g., communal work; and (3) the sanctions for noncompliance (Netting 1981, Kissling-Näf et al 2002, Tiefenbach and Mordasini 2006. The cheese produced is distributed to the farmers according to the relative amount of milk produced by each farmer's cows, which is measured twice a month.…”
Section: Common Property Meadows In the Swiss Alpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent research interest in innovation systems in the forest sector (Rametsteiner 2006), little work has been done to understand the complexity of property rights in European forestry. Property rights were analysed in the context of sustainable forestry (Bass and Hearne 1997), of forest law and regulations (Kissling-Näf and Bisang 2001;Schmithüsen 2004), of common property in Alps region (Kissling-Näf et al 2002;Glück 2002), of restitution and privatisation of forestland (Bouriaud and Schmithüsen 2005), and of joint community-state forest management schemes (Tuukka 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%