1988
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90171-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
145
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3-10. As shown above, any synchrony that remains in average-referenced data cannot logically be due to the artifact postulated by Fein et al (1988). Episodes of synchrony in average-referenced data are genuine.…”
Section: Common Reference Artifactmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3-10. As shown above, any synchrony that remains in average-referenced data cannot logically be due to the artifact postulated by Fein et al (1988). Episodes of synchrony in average-referenced data are genuine.…”
Section: Common Reference Artifactmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Any EEG measurement represents the voltage difference between a recording site, V 1 and a reference site, V ref . As pointed out by Fein et al (1988), any major reduction in power under electrode V 1 will cause the measurement V 1 À V ref to be dominated by activity under the reference electrode, V ref . This has the potential to cause artifactual synchrony, due to the comparison of two measurements both of which are dominated V ref .…”
Section: Common Reference Artifactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a common reference for coherence and phase synchronization analysis has been criticized in recent years based on the argument that the common reference introduces spurious correlations uniformly distributed over the scalp [Fein et al, 1988;Guevara et al, 2005;Nunez et al, 1997;Schiff, 2005]. Instead, the use of surface Laplacians has been encouraged because they are essentially reference-free and additionally reduce the volume conduction effect [Nunez, 1995;Pernier et al, 1988;Perrin et al, 1987Perrin et al, , 1989Schiff, 2005].…”
Section: Reference Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these problems may introduce spurious correlations between different EEG channels, even if they are relatively apart [15]. Various methods have been proposed to deal with these issues; particularly, in the case of cognitive tasks, by adequately choosing the reference site (e.g., linked earlobes), one may assume that any activity at the reference is not related to the task, and thus its effect may be greatly reduced by averaging over multiple trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%