Communicated identities of regional cluster firms

Abstract

PurposeThis paper presents the results of exploratory research aimed at understanding how firms operating in regional clusters use the clusters' collective identity in their external communication and combine it with the communication of their individual identity. In particular, the paper aims to detect different behaviors among different types of firms.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative exploratory content analysis is performed on the websites of the wineries of the Franciacorta wine cluster (Italy). A two‐step cluster analysis is used to identify differences in identity communications.FindingsThe results suggest the existence of two groups manifesting different patterns of identity communication. Larger firms communicate their individual identity through symbols, but they consistently communicate collective values. The other group (on average smaller firms, but including some of the biggest) seems to exploit collective identity symbols, without giving prominence to collective values.Practical implicationsThis study provides an understanding of how companies communicate collective symbols and values promoted by cooperative institutions; this understanding can be beneficial for future developments of collective branding projects.Originality/valueThis research contributes to broadening the debate on cluster identity as a strategic resource by adopting a communication perspective as well as providing empirical data on how different types of clusters' firms actually combine a collective cluster's identity and their firm's identity to shape their external image.

The Brand–Land Identity of Etna Volcano Valley Wines: A Policy Delphi Study

“…Moreover, these results provide food for thought concerning effective communication tactics that can be adopted by all actors in the Etna territory. In particular, in line with prior studies, institutional communication aimed at enhancing and promoting the territory as a whole, i.e., taking into account material and immaterial elements, was considered crucial [80]. Communication today cannot ignore the significant changes that have occurred in recent years in the ways and means utilized by companies for communication purposes.…”

Marca de clúster: un enfoque de participación para el desarrollo del clúster

“…debido a la aglomeración, más que algo que debe de ser formado y sostenido a través de la identificación de las compañías individuales con el clúster (Pinkse et al, 2018;Zamparini & Lurati, 2012). Por lo tanto, es importante buscar novedosos y diferentes enfoques para la gestión de la identidad del clúster, con el fin de generar estrategias efectivas enfocadas a apoyar el desarrollo del clúster.…”