2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2008.4702778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication capacity assesment for the Iris satellite system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…External inputs are shaded in grey and discussed in more detail below. Details on the simulation infrastructure can be found in [2], [3], and [5].…”
Section: Figure 1 Simulation Tool Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…External inputs are shaded in grey and discussed in more detail below. Details on the simulation infrastructure can be found in [2], [3], and [5].…”
Section: Figure 1 Simulation Tool Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data traffic model was developed on the basis of air traffic models, the COCRv2 report, and Iris results reported in [2] and [3]. It included the anticipated ATS and AOC data traffic applications as well as remaining voice services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, ATG applications generate data traffic according to traffic load expectation for year 2025, available in [14]. In order to make the scenario more realistic, it is assumed that 100 aircrafts can share the satellite link and transmit messages.…”
Section: A Reference Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of typical aeronautical traffic pattern composed of safety messages, transported on the FW and the RT links, is depicted in Figure 1. The plotted time trace is based on a 2 hours-flight simulation in the TMA-ENR domain, run according to the expected data traffic statistics, provided in [14]. Figure 1(a) and 1(b) show the size of the messages and their inter-arrival times: Significant fluctuations of the message size can be particulary observed in the case of the FW channel (transporting also the large WXGRAPH messages), whereas RT channel shows much smaller variations.…”
Section: A Scenario and Traffic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Figures 9 and 10 show an aeronautical traffic pattern on the FW and the RT links, respectively. These plots show a sample test for two hours flight simulation in the TMA-ENR domain based on statistical expected traffic reports from (Rokitansky et al, 2008).…”
Section: Aeronautical Traffic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%