Communicative Violence In Psychotherapy

Abstract

After some theoretical reflections on communicative violence based on the concept of the "double body" (Sybille Krämer) which explains why words can heal or hurt, we show excerpts from therapeutic session using conversation analysis as methodological tool to make subtle forms of violence visible. The problem of violence is not one-sided from therapist to patient but the inverse direction should be included, too. We detect that it is sometimes the "good will" of therapists to help a patient "overcome" a (supposed) "inhibition" to continue talk that contributes to symmetrical escalations in conversation causing trouble in turn-taking. Sometimes it is an up-to-now undescribed practice of patients, which we call "empathy blinder". A mild and a more complex form of this pattern are described. Further examples are analyzed hoping to direct some attention to the problem of communicative violence. In general, we do not yet present solutions, more expositions of a problem widely under taboo.

The Building of Empathy: Conceptual “Pillars” and Conversational Practices in Psychotherapy

“…It is not empathy that fails here, but one of its precursors. Actively but unconsciously, the patient paralyses the therapist's hermeneutic abilities-we speak of "communicative stun grenades" [79]. Of course, there are much more severe examples.…”

“I’ll Look Into it!” Lubricants in Conversational Coproduction

“…I thank Mark Elam for suggesting the notion of "conversational coproduction." Although conversation analysts could talk about a conversational co-construction, or sometimes even a coproduction of knowledge, that regards the actual micro-situation, e.g., coproduction of learning in conversation(Boyd 2004), of meaning of an acronym in a group discussion(Bierbach and Birken-Silverman 2007), or of empathy between patient and therapist(Buchholz and Alder 2015), or the like. Here, the ambition is rather to…”