Community-based football in men with prostate cancer: 1-year follow-up on a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundPhysical exercise has been shown to be effective in relation to fatigue, aerobic fitness, and lower body strength in men with prostate cancer. However, research into the clinically relevant effects of interventions conducted in heterogeneous patient populations and in real-life clinical practice settings is warranted.Methods and findingsWe conducted a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel randomised controlled trial in 5 Danish urological departments. Recruitment began in May 2015, the first participant was randomised in June 2015, and the last participant was included in February 2017. In total, 214 men with prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either 6 months of free-of-charge football training twice weekly at a local club (football group [FG]) (n = 109) or usual care (usual care group [UG]) (n = 105), including brief information on physical activity recommendations at randomisation. Participants were on average 68.4 (SD 6.2) years old, 157 (73%) were retired, 87 (41%) were on castration-based treatment, 19 (9%) had received chemotherapy, and 41 (19%) had skeletal metastases at baseline. In this 1-year follow-up study, we evaluated the effects of community-based football training on the following outcomes: primary outcome, quality of life; secondary outcomes: continuation of football after 6 months, hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), mental health score, fat and lean body mass, and safety outcomes, i.e., fractures, falls, and hospital admissions. Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were conducted. No statistically significant between-group difference was observed in change in prostate-cancer-specific quality of life (ITT: 1.9 points [95% CI −1.9 to 5.8], p = 0.325; PP: 3.6 points [95% CI −0.9 to 8.2], p = 0.119). A statistically significant between-group difference was observed in change in total hip BMD, in favour of FG (0.007 g/cm2 [95% CI 0.004 to 0.013], p = 0.037). No differences were observed in change in lumbar spine BMD or lean body mass. Among patients allocated to football, 59% chose to continue playing football after the end of the 6-month intervention period. At 1-year follow-up in the PP population, FG participants had more improvement on the Mental Component Summary (2.9 [95% CI 0.0 to 5.7], p = 0.048 points higher) than UG participants, as well as a greater loss of fat mass (−0.9 kg [95% CI −1.7 to −0.1], p = 0.029). There were no differences between groups in relation to fractures or falls. Hospital admissions were more frequent in UG compared to FG (33 versus 20; the odds ratio based on PP analysis was 0.34 for FG compared to UG). There were 3 deaths in FG and 4 in UG. Main limitations of the study were the physically active control group and assessment of physical activity by means of self-report.ConclusionsIn this trial, participants allocated to football appeared to have improved hip BMD and fewer hospital admissions. Men who played football more than once a week for 1 year lost fat mass and reported improved mental health. Community-based football ...

Effects of Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Fitness, Physiological Responses, and Health Indices in Untrained Individuals and Clinical Populations: A Systematic Review

“…Additionally, a recent injury cohort study reported that among 1,821 recreational soccer players (employees played each week-end), the incidence of injury was high leading to 1,196 days of labour loss, accounting for 211.5 days off per 1,000 match hours [74]. More recently, [75] showed no increase in severe injuries and the number of hospital admissions when playing soccer for one year on 200 elderly men with prostate cancer. Thus, it is recommended to avoid contact situations during SSSG.…”

Spinal Stabilization Exercises for Cancer Patients with Spinal Metastases of High Fracture Risk: Feasibility of the DISPO-II Training Program

“…Other studies were not specially designed for patients with bone metastases but included some, among others. Most of these studies defined painful or unstable bone metastases as exclusion criteria [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], medical clearance as a prerequisite [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] and/or modified the training program to enhance safety [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Only three studies reported no special attention when including patients with bone metastases [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”

The effect of exercise-based interventions on health-related quality of life and physical function in older patients with cancer receiving medical antineoplastic treatments: a systematic review

“…In addition, two studies had very small sample sizes (< 20), which increases the risk of biased results. In hindsight, several exercise-based RCTs have been conducted among patients with cancer, and even if older patients in general are underrepresented in exercise-based trials, some trials have a reasonable representation of older individuals [ 47 , 48 ] and/or may provide age-divided results.…”