The SAGE Handbook of Participatory Research and Inquiry 2021
DOI: 10.4135/9781529769432.n47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Based Participatory Research: Embracing Praxis for Transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were also in line with previous studies assessing CBPR interventions, especially those targeting behavioral change in different populations, where sustainability was related to equitable partnership established between the community members, academicians, and other stakeholders, as well as their collective actions focusing on knowledge transfer and knowledge mobilization (47,(67)(68)(69). As suggested by Wallerstein and colleagues (22,70), the sustainability of the CBPR intervention presented in this study was owing to the fact that the PA intervention was not only built on the needs of the community but also that the citizens were involved in the development of the intervention, including defining the goals for evaluating it. Furthermore, within the larger programme in which the current study was a part, the community members defined their problems and identified themes for promoting health, and only after this phase (described within the larger program as step 2), the other stakeholders were involved together with the citizens in the planning process.…”
Section: Improved Mental Health and Sustainability Of The Cbpr Interv...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results were also in line with previous studies assessing CBPR interventions, especially those targeting behavioral change in different populations, where sustainability was related to equitable partnership established between the community members, academicians, and other stakeholders, as well as their collective actions focusing on knowledge transfer and knowledge mobilization (47,(67)(68)(69). As suggested by Wallerstein and colleagues (22,70), the sustainability of the CBPR intervention presented in this study was owing to the fact that the PA intervention was not only built on the needs of the community but also that the citizens were involved in the development of the intervention, including defining the goals for evaluating it. Furthermore, within the larger programme in which the current study was a part, the community members defined their problems and identified themes for promoting health, and only after this phase (described within the larger program as step 2), the other stakeholders were involved together with the citizens in the planning process.…”
Section: Improved Mental Health and Sustainability Of The Cbpr Interv...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The Lindängen programme adopted a consistent community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach ( 2 , 3 ) and both structure and content were defined by the community. There was a long process together with the community before activities in the labs could start.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these initial contacts, it appeared that activities in the neighbourhood were not driven by residents, although there had earlier existed a grassroots organisation called Street Power (gatukraft). Knowledge about health promotion and perceived needs was lacking, and residents expressed a mistrust in the health care system ( 3 , 13 ). However, residents also expressed a sense of belonging and “place identity” [see Rämgård ( 15 )].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations