2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-015-1905-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Detection Utilizing a Novel Multi-swarm Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm with Hill-Climbing Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of CD-OPGPBA is compared with many state-of-the-art static community detection methods, including ECSD [26], FN [27], GN [28], Meme-net [29], walktrap [31], CNM [32], BGLL [33], MSFCM [34], FMM/H1 [35], Informap [36], LAP_CL [37], TNS-LPA [38], ECES [7], MAGA-net [30], GATHB [39], MOGA [40], ECGA [41], CC-GA [42], MOEA/D [43], VOLUME 10, 2022 DBA [44], ACODCS [45], MPSOA [46], MODPSO [47], DECD [48], CCDECD [49], IDDE [50], CDMFOA [51], Com-MOEA/D [57], CDEMO [52], MDSTA [53], and SOSCD [54]. Here, the first 13 community detection methods adopt the traditional methods to optimize the modularity function, and the other 17 community detection methods adopt the meta-heuristics evolutionary optimization approaches to optimize the modularity function, where GA is employed as an optimization strategy by MAGA-net, GATHB, MOGA, ECGA, CC-GA, and MOEA/D, DE is employed as an optimization strategy by DECD, CCDECD, IDDE, and CDEMO, and BA, ACO, PSO, FOA, STA, and SOS is employed as optimization strategies by the rest of the algorithms, respectively.…”
Section: ) Results On Small-scale Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of CD-OPGPBA is compared with many state-of-the-art static community detection methods, including ECSD [26], FN [27], GN [28], Meme-net [29], walktrap [31], CNM [32], BGLL [33], MSFCM [34], FMM/H1 [35], Informap [36], LAP_CL [37], TNS-LPA [38], ECES [7], MAGA-net [30], GATHB [39], MOGA [40], ECGA [41], CC-GA [42], MOEA/D [43], VOLUME 10, 2022 DBA [44], ACODCS [45], MPSOA [46], MODPSO [47], DECD [48], CCDECD [49], IDDE [50], CDMFOA [51], Com-MOEA/D [57], CDEMO [52], MDSTA [53], and SOSCD [54]. Here, the first 13 community detection methods adopt the traditional methods to optimize the modularity function, and the other 17 community detection methods adopt the meta-heuristics evolutionary optimization approaches to optimize the modularity function, where GA is employed as an optimization strategy by MAGA-net, GATHB, MOGA, ECGA, CC-GA, and MOEA/D, DE is employed as an optimization strategy by DECD, CCDECD, IDDE, and CDEMO, and BA, ACO, PSO, FOA, STA, and SOS is employed as optimization strategies by the rest of the algorithms, respectively.…”
Section: ) Results On Small-scale Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various soft computing evolutionary heuristic strategies have also been applied to evolve communities by optimizing an objective function through selection of the fittest methodology. To optimize modularity Gach and Hao (2012) applied memetic evolutionary algorithm; Banati and Arora (2015) applied Group Search Optimization(GSO); Wang et al (2013) applied Differential Evolution; Hafez et al (2014) applied Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimization algorithm; Shang et al (2013) applied improved Genetic algorithm accompanied with simulated annealing as a local search; Gong et al (2013) proposed MODPSO by modifying Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) algorithm and others (Cao et al, 2015;Gong et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2015;Pizzuti 2008). However all these methods were single objective in nature.…”
Section: Figure 1 Broad Categorization Of Community Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z. Li et al [25] have proposed a multi-agent genetic algorithm for large-scale networks (MAGA-Net) to overcome local optima problem. Other time consumption, the major problems affects the performance than existing algorithms, especially, community detection method utilizing multi-swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm (CDMFOA) [26], that are slow convergence of GA, unguided mutation, no guarantee of finding global maxima, difficult fine tuning of GA parameters, and long training time.…”
Section: Problem Definition and Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choose smell best and location-The traditional FOA [26] utilized to compute the smellbest. Because the value of best smell may change in different fruit fly population, so the smellbest is used to keep the best smell so as to have a comparison with the maximal smell concentration in the next fruit fly population.…”
Section: Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm Based On Differential Evolumentioning
confidence: 99%