2022
DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2021.2022449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community perceptions of climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation in the mangrove ecosystem of the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Setelah diklasifikasikan berdasarkan Departemen Kehutanan (2005) kerusakan ekosistem mangrove biasanya terjadi cenderung akibat dari kebutuhan ekonomi masyarakat lokal yang semakin meningkat. Menurut Perum Perhutani (1994), kerusakan dari ekosistem mangrove dapat terjadi karena keinginan masyarakat membuat pertambakan karena dirasa lebih menguntungkan, rendahnya pengetahuan masyarakat akan fungsi mangrove, dan kebutuhan kayu bakar untuk memasak atau bahan bangunan (Nyangoko et al, 2021). Kebutuhan untuk rumahtangga dan bahan bangunan terletak pada Desa Rawagempol Kulon, yang mana selalu penurunan pada klasifikasi lebat setiap tahunnya.…”
Section: Kerapatan Mangroveunclassified
“…Setelah diklasifikasikan berdasarkan Departemen Kehutanan (2005) kerusakan ekosistem mangrove biasanya terjadi cenderung akibat dari kebutuhan ekonomi masyarakat lokal yang semakin meningkat. Menurut Perum Perhutani (1994), kerusakan dari ekosistem mangrove dapat terjadi karena keinginan masyarakat membuat pertambakan karena dirasa lebih menguntungkan, rendahnya pengetahuan masyarakat akan fungsi mangrove, dan kebutuhan kayu bakar untuk memasak atau bahan bangunan (Nyangoko et al, 2021). Kebutuhan untuk rumahtangga dan bahan bangunan terletak pada Desa Rawagempol Kulon, yang mana selalu penurunan pada klasifikasi lebat setiap tahunnya.…”
Section: Kerapatan Mangroveunclassified
“…These begin with British colonial afforestation programs and the gazetting of forest reserves by both the British and post-revolutionary governments in the 1960s (Chachage 2000). Following 50 more years of initiatives driven by a number of Scandinavian countries, in 2010 the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Land Degradation program (REDD+) identified 18 wards (shehia) in Pemba as appropriate for piloting their payments for ecosystem services conservation framework (Burgess et al 2010;RGZ 1996;Nations 1992). The REDD+ project intended to pay communities to forego harvesting fuelwood and timber and cease farm expansion inside of designated areas in each of the 18 selected shehia.…”
Section: -Field Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still unclear how individuals perceptions' of environmental change affect their choices to limit resource use, restore ecosystems, or otherwise change their behaviors (Paloniemi et al 2018). In particular, as pointed out by Meyfroidt (2013), few studies have linked individual perceptions of threats and change in natural resources with observed conservation behaviors and preferences (although see Nyangoko et al 2022). Further, a recent systematic review of 128 studies of voluntary adoption of conservation behaviors showed a dearth of research on the subject in non-Western populations (Thomas-Walters et al 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation, mangroves ecological resources form a vast array from food (59.7%), fuel (51.9%), and fishing materials and construction supplies (44.8%). Recognition that mangroves deliver one or all of these advantages was reported in numerous studies [29,30,31,32,33]. Among the stated benefits of this ecosystem, locals around the world are known to understand its importance and its impact on their livelihood [34,35].…”
Section: Data Deficient (Dd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Least Concern (LC)Evaluated against the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened Near Threatened (NT)Evaluated against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future. rumphiana has the highest individuals (152) followed by A. marina (132), N. fruticans(33), A. alba (9) and S. alba (1) and accounting to 327 individuals.ISSN: 2456-7132 Available online at Journals.aijr.org…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%