“…For instance, some ombudsman programs operate in a noncontest‐oriented manner with volunteers playing rather neutral roles as mediators and resource brokers (e.g., New York), while other programs employ a tougher patient rights model that involves volunteers taking on contest‐oriented roles as consumer advocates and watchdogs (e.g., Oregon) (Nelson, 1995). The ombudsmen are essentially external agents of quality assurance in LTC and, as such, provide an important community presence in LTC facilities (Cherry, 1993). Although ombudsman programs are implemented by both paid staff and volunteers, the vast majority of ombudsman program personnel are volunteers.…”
Section: Particiption In the Ltc Programmentioning
Objectives. Does aggregate ideological extremism reduce public participation? Does participation in governance processes fall when the social environment shifts to the extreme left or the extreme right of the political spectrum? Our main hypothesis is that the aggregate ideological orientation of the social environment constrains volunteerism in social regulatory programs. Methods. We test our hypothesis using a panel tobit analysis of data from the federal Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. Results. Our model of public participation (expressed as volunteerism) shows that participation expands when the ideological position of a state's citizens is at the extreme left or right of the political continuum. We show the differential effects of two types of aggregate ideological orientation: of citizens and their political leaders. We further find that participation is greatest in states with extremely liberal citizen ideological positions. Conclusions. These findings paint a more complex picture of the effect of extremism in the social environment on public participation measured as production volunteerism. In sum, public participation is greatest when the social environment is ideologically polarized, and social regulation is strongest when volunteerism is greatest.
“…For instance, some ombudsman programs operate in a noncontest‐oriented manner with volunteers playing rather neutral roles as mediators and resource brokers (e.g., New York), while other programs employ a tougher patient rights model that involves volunteers taking on contest‐oriented roles as consumer advocates and watchdogs (e.g., Oregon) (Nelson, 1995). The ombudsmen are essentially external agents of quality assurance in LTC and, as such, provide an important community presence in LTC facilities (Cherry, 1993). Although ombudsman programs are implemented by both paid staff and volunteers, the vast majority of ombudsman program personnel are volunteers.…”
Section: Particiption In the Ltc Programmentioning
Objectives. Does aggregate ideological extremism reduce public participation? Does participation in governance processes fall when the social environment shifts to the extreme left or the extreme right of the political spectrum? Our main hypothesis is that the aggregate ideological orientation of the social environment constrains volunteerism in social regulatory programs. Methods. We test our hypothesis using a panel tobit analysis of data from the federal Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. Results. Our model of public participation (expressed as volunteerism) shows that participation expands when the ideological position of a state's citizens is at the extreme left or right of the political continuum. We show the differential effects of two types of aggregate ideological orientation: of citizens and their political leaders. We further find that participation is greatest in states with extremely liberal citizen ideological positions. Conclusions. These findings paint a more complex picture of the effect of extremism in the social environment on public participation measured as production volunteerism. In sum, public participation is greatest when the social environment is ideologically polarized, and social regulation is strongest when volunteerism is greatest.
“…5 24-32 There were two longitudinal studies in nursing homes with a follow up of several years, 33 34 and four studies with a post-test design only. [35][36][37][38] The number of participating nursing homes involved in the selected studies ranged from one to 268, with 13 studies of 1-16 nursing homes, two of 60 nursing homes, and six with more than 200 participating nursing homes.…”
Section: Research Design Of the Selected Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study investigated whether an ombudsman for residents in nursing homes would lead to better outcomes and more compliance with standards. 35 The researchers concluded that the presence of an ombudsman who can visit residents and resolve disputes on their behalf might improve the outcomes of care, but there were no indications of better compliance with standards. No control group was included in this study.…”
The design of most of the studies meant that it was not possible to attribute the results entirely to the newly implemented quality system. As it is difficult in practice to design a randomised controlled study, future research into the effectiveness of quality systems should not only focus on selected correlates of quality, but should also include a qualitative and quantitative (multivariate and multilevel) approach. The methods used to measure quality need to be improved.
“…Several outcome measures were highlighted in the Institute of Medicine report and have been routinely used to assess quality, including changes in residents' functional status or decubiti and the prevalence of physical restraints (cf. Cherry, 1993). Mukamel and Brower (1998) however point out that these measures can inappropriately classify a facility as either poor-quality or high-quality homes if not sufficiently adjusted for risk.…”
Section: Journal Of Elder Abuse and Neglectmentioning
The research assessed the impact of a major innovation in the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program that occurred in Rhode Island in 1997-the introduction of a volunteer component in which community members were trained and certified as advocates for residents in long-term care. Based on reports to the state ombudsman office, the findings indicated that the placement of volunteer ombudsman was associated with the generation of more complaints and more serious complaints about the facilities in which they were placed, some of which could not be resolved despite the greater intensity of interventions applied in these cases. Dat derived from nursing home inspections revealed a negative and significant correlation between the length of time a volunteer had been at a facility and the number of deficiencies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.