2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100047
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Rehabilitation Outcomes for Different Stroke Diagnoses: An Observational Cohort Study

Abstract: Objective To determine the differences in functional and cognitive rehabilitation gains made in community-based rehabilitation following a stroke based on stroke diagnosis (left or right hemisphere, hemorrhagic, or ischemic). Design A 12-month follow-up observational retrospective cohort study. Setting Staged community-based brain injury rehabilitation. Participants Clients (N=61) with hemorrhagic left brain stroke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and a neurologic disorder are originating from the blockage or rupture of cerebral blood vessels with ischemic or hemorrhagic etiologies ( AlHarfany et al, 2020 ; Ullah et al, 2020 ). Stroke or CVA leads to death and is the third leading cause of disability worldwide ( Williams et al, 2020 ). Annually, there are 15 million reported stroke cases, with 5.8 million reported deaths globally ( Al-Senani et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and a neurologic disorder are originating from the blockage or rupture of cerebral blood vessels with ischemic or hemorrhagic etiologies ( AlHarfany et al, 2020 ; Ullah et al, 2020 ). Stroke or CVA leads to death and is the third leading cause of disability worldwide ( Williams et al, 2020 ). Annually, there are 15 million reported stroke cases, with 5.8 million reported deaths globally ( Al-Senani et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke: In the two included studies in which clinicians completed the MPAI-4 it had sufficient construct validity (4/5 hypotheses met) but insufficient responsiveness for all but the participation index (6/8 hypotheses met). 42,43 However, this is not yet based on high quality evidence -small sample sizes 42 and subgroup differences impeding comparison resulted in a low quality evidence rating per COSMIN criteria.…”
Section: Outpatient (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also mounting evidence to support the clinical use of standardised outcome measures20 21 to support the improvement of individuals’ function and participation,22 23 enhance patient rehabilitation outcomes,24–26 facilitate a patient-centred approach,27 and maintain clinical excellence and commitment to evidence-informed practices 28 29. An outcome measure used for these purposes is the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-version 4 (MPAI-4) which can assess both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation patients’ functional abilities and status 30–33. Worldwide government health authorities and organisations have incorporated the MPAI-4 as part of their recommended practices in rehabilitation care for survivors of acquired brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%