1993
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/86.10.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community screening for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: self-testing for post-prandial glycosuria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate is based on observations in a number of surveys, including the Diabetes Survey in Bedford, England in 1962 (Keen, 1964;Butter®eld et al, 1967) and studies in other ethnic groups (Jackson et al, 1968;Cheah et al, 1972;Chaisiri et al, 1997). Our predictive value is likely to be higher, because we only included persons with approximated fasting glycosuria, who are more likely to have NIDDM than those with postprandial glycosuria (Davies et al, 1993). By restricting the study population to those for whom urine samples were available after at least a 3 h fast, we increased the likelihood of overlooking cases of NIDDM, since tests on such samples have lower sensitivities than tests on postprandial urine samples (Bitzen and Schersten, 1986;Forrest et al, 1987;Chaisiri et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This estimate is based on observations in a number of surveys, including the Diabetes Survey in Bedford, England in 1962 (Keen, 1964;Butter®eld et al, 1967) and studies in other ethnic groups (Jackson et al, 1968;Cheah et al, 1972;Chaisiri et al, 1997). Our predictive value is likely to be higher, because we only included persons with approximated fasting glycosuria, who are more likely to have NIDDM than those with postprandial glycosuria (Davies et al, 1993). By restricting the study population to those for whom urine samples were available after at least a 3 h fast, we increased the likelihood of overlooking cases of NIDDM, since tests on such samples have lower sensitivities than tests on postprandial urine samples (Bitzen and Schersten, 1986;Forrest et al, 1987;Chaisiri et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who did not state the time since their last meal (109 men and 83 women) and those who had eaten within the last 3 h were excluded (9494 (35%) men and 8803 (29%) women). These exclusions were made because postprandial glycosuria is more likely than fasting glycosuria to be a consequence of alimentary and renal glycosuria, which are normal conditions that are not predictive of NIDDM (Davies, 1993).…”
Section: Dietary Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level had a sensitivity of 83% and 95%, respectively, in the USA and Israel with corresponding specificities of 76% and 47%, and PPVs of 17.2% and 11.8%. Davies et al (1993) performed a similar study in 442 people from the Isle of Ely, UK. At an FPG cut-point of 5.5 mmol/L sensitivity was 96% and specificity 28%, compared with results of 65% and 64%, respectively, with a cut-point of 6.0 mmol/L.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we have shown in a large study based in general practice that a postal request system with self testing for postprandial glycosuria is an effective method of screening for diabetes 2. In a target population of 13795 subjects aged 45-70 years, 99 new cases of diabetes were identified by this method at a cost of pounds sterling 81 per new case (1990 prices).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a target population of 13795 subjects aged 45-70 years, 99 new cases of diabetes were identified by this method at a cost of pounds sterling 81 per new case (1990 prices). We have proposed ways in which this cost could be reduced 2. We have since shown that this method can be effectively repeated after 30 months, suggesting that public cooperation in repeated testing for diabetes can be maintained 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%