2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-016-0398-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commutators for near-rings: Huq $${\neq}$$ ≠ Smith

Abstract: Abstract. It is shown that the Huq and the Smith commutators do not coincide in the variety of near-rings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The list of known algebraic structures whose categories have the two commutators different from each other includes loops (where, as mentioned in [28], this can be deduced from the result of Exercise 10 of Chapter 5 in [24]), digroups (=sets equipped with two independent group structures with the same identity element; see e.g. [13]), and near-rings (as shown in [40]; note, on the other hand, that prime ideals of near-rings were introduced and studied in [64]). (f) There is more to say about various non-modular commutators introduced in universal algebra, the relative commutator in the sense of T. Everaert and T. Van der Linden [21], and commutator theory and related studies in regular (not necessarily Barr exact) categories developed in several papers of D. Bourn and M. Gran, but we omit it here.…”
Section: Ideals In An Abstract Commutative Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of known algebraic structures whose categories have the two commutators different from each other includes loops (where, as mentioned in [28], this can be deduced from the result of Exercise 10 of Chapter 5 in [24]), digroups (=sets equipped with two independent group structures with the same identity element; see e.g. [13]), and near-rings (as shown in [40]; note, on the other hand, that prime ideals of near-rings were introduced and studied in [64]). (f) There is more to say about various non-modular commutators introduced in universal algebra, the relative commutator in the sense of T. Everaert and T. Van der Linden [21], and commutator theory and related studies in regular (not necessarily Barr exact) categories developed in several papers of D. Bourn and M. Gran, but we omit it here.…”
Section: Ideals In An Abstract Commutative Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that Huq=Smith for left skew braces. Notice that Huq = Smith for digroups and near-rings [18]. We give a set of generators for the commutator of two ideals, and prove that every ideal of a left skew brace has a centralizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%