2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00029-014-0155-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuting differential operators and higher-dimensional algebraic varieties

Abstract: Several algebro-geometric properties of commutative rings of partial differential operators as well as several geometric constructions are investigated. In particular, we show how to associate a geometric data by a commutative ring of partial differential operators, and we investigate the properties of these geometric data. This construction is in some sense similar to the construction of a formal module of Baker-Akhieser functions. On the other hand, there is a recent generalization of Sato's theory which bel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The statements about kr. dim(B) and coherence of F B can be proven exactly in the same way as in [34].…”
Section: Proof Observe Thatmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The statements about kr. dim(B) and coherence of F B can be proven exactly in the same way as in [34].…”
Section: Proof Observe Thatmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Finally, papers [20,21] deal with the correspondence between 'geometric data' and commutative rings of partial differential operators, particularly, in two variables. Thus it would be interesting to describe the geometric data corresponding to the rings of quasi-invariants considered in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To formulate this statement recall one construction (without details) given in section 3.2 of [18]. For a given integral two-dimensional scheme X of finite type over a field k (or over the integers) there is a "minimal" Cohen-Macaulay scheme CM (X) and a finite morphism CM (X) → X (and a finite morphism from the normalization of X to CM (X) ).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%